Welcome, Guest

 or  Register
NewsFeed

Trump is looking dumpy.
#31
(02-15-2018, 03:06 PM)Lily Wrote: It is actually a very Democratic move. Those that drive a lot will pay in fuel tax the repairs of the roads vs those that take public transportation can keep their tax break. Please never lose site that Trump was a D for years. Ivanka has a proposal for paid family leave, that should clue you in who she is also. Since I had 9 months of pregnancy, I was able to set aside money to cover myself while on maternity leave.

The trumps are absolutely NO DIFFERENT as I see it than hussein obama or the bush's.
Reply Share
#32
(02-15-2018, 03:05 PM)Fallingdown Wrote:
(02-15-2018, 02:59 PM)Dire_effects Wrote:
(02-15-2018, 02:57 PM)Fallingdown Wrote: At least you now understand that the money was spread out over 10 years .

I still consider it irrelevant, I will even predict that it will be squandered, and looted by the political class and their "contractors" who will drag things out.

So let me get this straight. You are not in favor of fixing the infrastructure ?

I am not for the feds acting outside the Constitution. No.
Reply Share
#33
I wonder how many hundreds of millions have been locked up in State Road Maintenance Trust Funds , never to be seen again . . . CAFR Knows All !
Celebrating Over 30 Years as a " Designated Paper Terrorist " - I Will Stand Corrected - No Legal Advice or Recommended Course of Action Expressed or Implied

The Constitution - Estate in Trust for the Heirs of Freedom - Local Link
Reply Share
#34
(02-15-2018, 03:16 PM)Dire_effects Wrote:
(02-15-2018, 03:05 PM)Fallingdown Wrote:
(02-15-2018, 02:59 PM)Dire_effects Wrote: I still consider it irrelevant, I will even predict that it will be squandered, and looted by the political class and their "contractors" who will drag things out.

So let me get this straight. You are not in favor of fixing the infrastructure ?

I am not for the feds acting outside the Constitution. No.

So it's outside the constitution to fix roads and bridges ?
.


“An opposing view makes you think
total agreement makes you copy paste “


FD





.
Reply Share
#35
(02-15-2018, 03:43 PM)Fallingdown Wrote:
(02-15-2018, 03:16 PM)Dire_effects Wrote:
(02-15-2018, 03:05 PM)Fallingdown Wrote: So let me get this straight. You are not in favor of fixing the infrastructure ?

I am not for the feds acting outside the Constitution. No.

So it's outside the constitution to fix roads  and bridges ?

Show me in the Constitution where it says anything at all about roads.

I'll wait.

And yes, they DID have roads when the Constitution was written.
Reply Share
#36
(02-15-2018, 03:46 PM)Dire_effects Wrote:
(02-15-2018, 03:43 PM)Fallingdown Wrote:
(02-15-2018, 03:16 PM)Dire_effects Wrote: I am not for the feds acting outside the Constitution. No.

So it's outside the constitution to fix roads  and bridges ?

Show me in the Constitution where it says anything at all about roads.

I'll wait.

And yes, they DID have roads when the Constitution was written.

It's a law that was enacted by Congress. It in no way breaks the constitution in fact that's one of the silliest things I've heard on conspiracy sites .

Look up the title A40, R51, H3516 or The infrastructure and transportation act of 1994 .

In case you didn't know you can work outside the constitution as long as it's not breaking it .
.


“An opposing view makes you think
total agreement makes you copy paste “


FD





.
Reply Share
#37
(02-15-2018, 03:52 PM)Fallingdown Wrote:
(02-15-2018, 03:46 PM)Dire_effects Wrote:
(02-15-2018, 03:43 PM)Fallingdown Wrote: So it's outside the constitution to fix roads  and bridges ?

Show me in the Constitution where it says anything at all about roads.

I'll wait.

And yes, they DID have roads when the Constitution was written.

It's a  law that was enacted by Congress. It in no way breaks the constitution in fact that's one of the silliest things I've heard on conspiracy sites .

Look up the  title A40, R51, H3516 or The infrastructure and transportation act of 1994 .

In case you didn't know you can work outside the constitution as long as it's not breaking it .

Shows me just how little you know, and how blindly you follow the follow the "governments" lead. You are not respectable.

Roads are not covered in the Constitution, and thus not a legitimate use of "government" funds.

As per the 10th amendment.

You should look that up, educate yourself a little.
Reply Share
#38
(02-15-2018, 04:06 PM)Dire_effects Wrote:
(02-15-2018, 03:52 PM)Fallingdown Wrote:
(02-15-2018, 03:46 PM)Dire_effects Wrote: Show me in the Constitution where it says anything at all about roads.

I'll wait.

And yes, they DID have roads when the Constitution was written.

It's a  law that was enacted by Congress. It in no way breaks the constitution in fact that's one of the silliest things I've heard on conspiracy sites .

Look up the  title A40, R51, H3516 or The infrastructure and transportation act of 1994 .

In case you didn't know you can work outside the constitution as long as it's not breaking it .

Shows me just how little you know, and how blindly you follow the follow the "governments" lead. You are not respectable.

Roads are not covered in the Constitution, and thus not a legitimate use of "government" funds.

As per the 10th amendment.

You should look that up, educate yourself a little.

You don't know much do you? Congress inacts laws which interpret the Constitution. There are also able to be challenged by the Federal court system . I gave you undeniable truth. Which is why you launched into a ad hom attack.
really surprise me i'm such a childish poster .
.


“An opposing view makes you think
total agreement makes you copy paste “


FD





.
Reply Share
#39
(02-15-2018, 04:06 PM)Dire_effects Wrote:
(02-15-2018, 03:52 PM)Fallingdown Wrote:
(02-15-2018, 03:46 PM)Dire_effects Wrote: Show me in the Constitution where it says anything at all about roads.

I'll wait.

And yes, they DID have roads when the Constitution was written.

It's a  law that was enacted by Congress. It in no way breaks the constitution in fact that's one of the silliest things I've heard on conspiracy sites .

Look up the  title A40, R51, H3516 or The infrastructure and transportation act of 1994 .

In case you didn't know you can work outside the constitution as long as it's not breaking it .

Shows me just how little you know, and how blindly you follow the follow the "governments" lead. You are not respectable.

Roads are not covered in the Constitution, and thus not a legitimate use of "government" funds.

As per the 10th amendment.

You should look that up, educate yourself a little.

You didn't even read the bill. Trump is giving block grants to the state for infrastructure .
.


“An opposing view makes you think
total agreement makes you copy paste “


FD





.
SoldiersAngel  likes this!
Reply Share
#40
(02-15-2018, 03:46 PM)Dire_effects Wrote: Show me in the Constitution where it says anything at all about roads.

I'll wait.

And yes, they DID have roads when the Constitution was written.

Article I, Section 8, Clause 7 : The Postal Clause or the Postal Power, The Congress shall have Power To...establish Post Offices and post Roads....

The Act of September 22, 1789 (1 Stat. 70) .


You're Welcome .
Celebrating Over 30 Years as a " Designated Paper Terrorist " - I Will Stand Corrected - No Legal Advice or Recommended Course of Action Expressed or Implied

The Constitution - Estate in Trust for the Heirs of Freedom - Local Link
Aquarius, FallingDown  likes this!
Reply Share