[Treebeard]

Komma, once again you're not paying attention to facts.
Trump is  spending more on the military budget than any other president, ever.
Over a trillion dollars per year now.
Guy is blowing up the deficit like a hot air balloon.
His 4 bankruptcies give him lots of experience in drunken sailor management techniques.

Maybe your personal hate is clouding your vision on this one.

Oh, that's an effective retort, don't address what I said,
but accuse me of hating Trump, which I do not, personally.
I agree with him on some issues and don't hate the guy.

[Sassy]

Komma, once again you're not paying attention to facts.
Trump is  spending more on the military budget than any other president, ever.
Over a trillion dollars per year now.
Guy is blowing up the deficit like a hot air balloon.
His 4 bankruptcies give him lots of experience in drunken sailor management techniques.

Maybe your personal hate is clouding your vision on this one.

Oh, that's an effective retort, don't address what I said,
but accuse me of hating Trump, which I do not, personally.
I agree with him on some issues and don't hate the guy.

With all due respect a lot of the posts you've made sound like you hate him and the US. The negativity is strong. If I'm wrong I'll apologize in a heartbeat.

[Deplorably Nameless]

Komma, once again you're not paying attention to facts.
Trump is  spending more on the military budget than any other president, ever.
Over a trillion dollars per year now.
Guy is blowing up the deficit like a hot air balloon.
His 4 bankruptcies give him lots of experience in drunken sailor management techniques.

Maybe your personal hate is clouding your vision on this one.

Oh, that's an effective retort, don't address what I said,
but accuse me of hating Trump, which I do not, personally.
I agree with him on some issues and don't hate the guy.

Why should I address what you typed when you barely address what the president said?

Instead you changed the course of the actual discussion and diverted the topic of the thread towards on actual attack on the president himself.

Do you not bother reading what you post?

I read everyone's posts before I comment...I also watch the videos they provide.

[Treebeard]

Deplorably Nameless, every single comment I made in this thread
was a direct reply to something you posted. You just don't like my replies.

Sassy, Trumpers and Trumpettes can be very thin-skinned in their emotional
response to anyone who doesn't lavish praise on whatever he does.
It's a standard of cultishness I can't approve of and have never seen before
in other presidencies.

[Deplorably Nameless]

Deplorably Nameless, every single comment I made in this thread
was a direct reply to something you posted. You just don't like my replies.

Sassy, Trumpers and Trumpettes can be very thin-skinned in their emotional
response to anyone who doesn't lavish praise on whatever he does.
It's a standard of cultishness I can't approve of and have never seen before
in other presidencies.

Every single comment you made on this thread was a direct reply to something I posted?

Is that so?

Are you sure about that?

Because tell me what comment I made that forced you to call @COW a wanker?

You accuse me of being in a cult, when you aren't even an American or in America...who is your president?

Oh, that's right...I don't give a shit.


And btw, the level of hate against this president I have NEVER seen before in any other presidency...especially, from foreigners.

[COW]

I see you are on the page of numbers, to be frank.....
The socialist mantra will not allow proper population control but the world is in charge not its inhabitants and population control is in full swing as the planet heats up for the coming Ice age. We will be forced to depopulate as we are driven back to the equator and underground.

Sorry, Treebeard, my posts are never personal I don't pick and choose the truth I wish to see or tell, I just post the truth as it is. Cheers!!

[Munchaab]

Play nice people - It's OK do disagree - it's not OK to name call...

[Treebeard]

Deplorably Nameless, every single comment I made in this thread
was a direct reply to something you posted. You just don't like my replies.

Sassy, Trumpers and Trumpettes can be very thin-skinned in their emotional
response to anyone who doesn't lavish praise on whatever he does.
It's a standard of cultishness I can't approve of and have never seen before
in other presidencies.

Every single comment you made on this thread was a direct reply to something I posted?

Is that so?

Are you sure about that?

Because tell me what comment I made that forced you to call @COW  a wanker?

You accuse me of being in a cult, when you aren't even an American or in America...who is your president?

Oh, that's right...I don't give a shit.


And btw, the level of hate against this president I have NEVER seen before in any other presidency...especially, from foreigners.

Yeah, pretty sure. Like you said Trump wants to "crush" NATO, which I pointed out is by
asking NATO to spend twice as much money on arms. That's what started it. Then you said
he's a great businessman and I pointed out his bankruptcies. One of which I owned stock in, btw.
Another is about his military spending which is astronomical.
I never "called COW a wanker".. I posted an emoji that is on the list here to express a view
of his comments which were highlighted in an amusing fashion, which in my opinion is not anywhere
near the same thing as "calling COW a wanker". For example, if I posted something, let's just say,
UNUSUAL, such as COW did, and you posted the green emoji I would not take your action as personally
calling me a wanker, but rather merely a reaction to the quoted words. COW is not a wanker.
I am a natural-born American who still lives within the borders of the US - so I will change the country tag
to avoid confusion. I did vote for Trump but that doesn't mean I refrain from criticism of his actions when
I disapprove of them. k ?

[Deplorably Nameless]

Deplorably Nameless, every single comment I made in this thread
was a direct reply to something you posted. You just don't like my replies.

Sassy, Trumpers and Trumpettes can be very thin-skinned in their emotional
response to anyone who doesn't lavish praise on whatever he does.
It's a standard of cultishness I can't approve of and have never seen before
in other presidencies.

Every single comment you made on this thread was a direct reply to something I posted?

Is that so?

Are you sure about that?

Because tell me what comment I made that forced you to call @COW  a wanker?

You accuse me of being in a cult, when you aren't even an American or in America...who is your president?

Oh, that's right...I don't give a shit.


And btw, the level of hate against this president I have NEVER seen before in any other presidency...especially, from foreigners.

Yeah, pretty sure. Like you said Trump wants to "crush" NATO, which I pointed out is by
asking NATO to spend twice as much money on arms. That's what started it. Then you said
he's a great businessman and I pointed out his bankruptcies. One of which I owned stock in, btw.
Another is about his military spending which is astronomical.
I never "called COW a wanker".. I posted an emoji that is on the list here to express a view
of his comments which were highlighted in an amusing fashion, which in my opinion is not anywhere
near the same thing as "calling COW a wanker". For example, if I posted something, let's just say,
UNUSUAL, such as COW did, and you posted the green emoji I would not take your action as personally
calling me a wanker, but rather merely a reaction to the quoted words. COW is not a wanker.
I am a natural-born American who still lives within the borders of the US - so I will change the country tag
to avoid confusion. I did vote for Trump but that doesn't mean I refrain from criticism of his actions when
I disapprove of them. k ?

I never typed any of that.

Maybe you need to go back and re-read all the posts on this thread.

[Deplorably Nameless]

I could not think of a more misleading headline.

Trump "crushes" NATO -

by asking them to spend more money to buy weapons and troops for NATO.

ok. gotcha.

Did you even to listen to what he had to say, why should anyone defend Germany against Russia while Russia is providing Germany with a pipeline of oil and gas. What he's saying is that Germany doesn't require any protection from it's trading partner and even if they did, they're not paying for it and they can afford to do so.

I think he is trying to pull the troops home from where they are not required, tighten the belt and with the savings improve the existing equipment for when and where it might be required. That makes perfect common sense to me.

Yep, that is exactly what he is said and what he is trying to do!

Thank you for creating this thread, KOMMA.