Welcome, Guest

 or  Register
NewsFeed

The Constitution does not grant Rights. It limits Government. Plus, the 1776 Continental Dollar
#41
Yup, Oh presumption, what a mess it has caused. Chuckle

That is what floored me when I read "Trespass and Conversion to Another Use". I was thinking specifically of 4 U.S.C.S. Sec. 110(d).

I don't know if you have ever explained this, so I would like to tell people a simple understanding of how to really deal with the beast (system). The system only recognizes itself, so the way to tame it is within. Use it against itself and that is, unfortunately, as Heir so eloquently wrote "lots of fun".

Heir (sorry for picking your brain, it just saves me hours searching), have you looked into, "claiming your estate"?

PS : They never said it was mandatory......ohhh presumption, our nemesis.  Chuckle
Scent of Cedar  likes this!
Reply Share
#42
(05-18-2018, 04:24 PM)ASOG Wrote: Heir (sorry for picking your brain, it just saves me hours searching), have you looked into, "claiming your estate"?

PS : They never said it was mandatory......ohhh presumption, our nemesis.  Chuckle


Claimed My Estate ? Not by any Process outside of Administrative Procedure . No Affidavits or other " Public Notice " Filed in the County Records . None of that Guru Mantra crap . I am a Member of the Posterity as noted in the Preamble to the Constitution and that is that . My Rebutable Claim , as yet Unrebutted .

I've dealt with the Monsters at legnth via Return Reciept Mail .

Jurisdiction may be Questioned for Clarification at any time . Understanding the Charges and all that . Figured would best be accomplished straight out of the gate .

I started with returning any machine generated correspondence to request a Subscribed letter of some sort . May need to find out some NAME in what ever Agency You are dealing with . Someone that has Human Eyes on to answer questions regarding Machine Letters .

IF this garners a proper letter , I have a NAME to Serve . My first Inquiry is in the Nature of Clarification . " Is the Signature NAME Acting in Capacity of an Office of Trust or one of Profit ? "

Always allow for My Question to be passed on to a Superior or Legal Department for Answer , if the NAME does not know . I'm gracious enough to wait 45 to 60 days for an Authoratative Responce .

If anyone thinks They gonna Play dis heah Game . . . start with a Legal Secretaries Handbook and learn the Basics of Style and Service of Process by Mail . Any Legal Department will recognize the correspondence as being Admissible as Evidence . The inference will be taken that a Paper Trail is being established for future Litigation . Little gets an Attorney's attention like Admissible papers .


Remember : Don't do this at home Kids !
Celebrating Over 25 Years as a Designated " Paper Terrorist " - I Will Stand Corrected - No Legal Advice or Recommended Course of Action Expressed or Implied

The Constitution - Estate in Trust for the Heirs of Freedom - Local Link
Scent of Cedar  likes this!
Reply Share
#43
Perfectly clear answer, thank you.
Scent of Cedar  likes this!
Reply Share
#44
My Pleasure . Play Safe now .
Celebrating Over 25 Years as a Designated " Paper Terrorist " - I Will Stand Corrected - No Legal Advice or Recommended Course of Action Expressed or Implied

The Constitution - Estate in Trust for the Heirs of Freedom - Local Link
Scent of Cedar  likes this!
Reply Share
#45
(05-15-2018, 09:23 PM)Heir Wrote: Facepalm


I'll let the 7 th Vice – President breach this subject . The only Politician found so far that does in direct language


Snips from posthumous publication not intended for general circulation :


A DISCOURSE ON THE 
CONSTITUTION AND GOVERNMENT 
OF THE UNITED STATES
John C. Calhoun

 It has for its fundamental principle, the great cardinal maxim, that the people are the source of all power; that the governments of the several States and of the United States were created by them, and for them; that the powers conferred on them are not surrendered, but delegated; and, as such, are held in trust, and not absolutely; and can be rightfully exercised only in furtherance of the objects for which they were delegated.


It is difficult to imagine how a doctrine so perfectly absurd, as that the States are federal as to the reserved, and national as to the delegated powers, could have originated; except through a misconception of the meaning of certain terms, sometimes used to designate the latter. They are sometimes called granted powers; and at others, are said to be powers surrendered by the States. When these expressions are used without reference to the fact, that all powers, under our system of government, are trust powers, they imply that the States have parted with such as are said to be granted or surrendered, absolutely and irrecoverably. The case is different when applied to them as trust powers. They then become identical, in their meaning, with delegated powers; for to grant a power in trust, is what is meant by delegating it. It is not, therefore, surprising, that they who do not bear in mind that all powers of government are, with us, trust powers, should conclude that the powers said to be granted and surrendered by the States, are absolutely transferred from them to the government of the United States — as is sometimes alleged — or to the people as constituting one nation, as is more usually understood — and, thence, to infer that the government is national to the extent of the granted powers.

But that such inference and conclusion are utterly unwarrantable — that the powers in the constitution called granted powers, are, in fact, delegated powers — powers granted in trust — and not absolutely transferred — we have, in addition to the reasons just stated, the clear and decisive authority of the constitution itself. Its tenth amended article provides that "the powers not delegated to the United States by the constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."

It is only by considering the granted powers, in their true character of trust or delegated powers, that all the various parts of our complicated system of government can be harmonized and explained. Thus regarded, it will be easy to perceive how the people of the several States could grant certain powers to a joint — or, as its framers called it — a general government, in trust, to be exercised for their common benefit, without an absolute surrender of them — or without impairing their independence and sovereignty. Regarding them in the opposite light, as powers absolutely surrendered and irrevocably transferred, inexplicable difficulties present themselves. Among the first, is that which springs from the idea of divided sovereignty; involving the perplexing question — how the people of the several States can be partly sovereign, and partly, not sovereign — sovereign as to the reserved — and not sovereign, as to the delegated powers? There is no difficulty in understanding how powers, appertaining to sovereignty, may be divided; and the exercise of one portion delegated to one set of agents, and another portion to another: or how sovereignty may be vested in one man, or in a few, or in many. But how sovereignty itself — the supreme power — can be divided — how the people of the several States can be partly sovereign, and partly not sovereign — partly supreme, and partly not supreme, it is impossible to conceive. Sovereignty is an entire thing — to divide, is — to destroy it.

Bravo, Bravo!
Scent of Cedar  likes this!
Reply Share
#46
And Ya wonder why history teachers and assorted school curricula denigrate Him so much . To listen to them He was one Man , THE ONE Man , single - handedly responsible for the War Between the States and Public Sentiment to continue the practice of Involuntary Servitude / Chattel Slavery among the Populace .

The Yankee Federals prevailed and now only the Federals can hold One to Involuntary Servitude / Slavery .

Everybody SING ! ! !

Oh Say Does That Star Strangled Banner Yet Wayy - YAWaavveeee

O're The Land of the FEE and the Home of the SLAVE ?
Celebrating Over 25 Years as a Designated " Paper Terrorist " - I Will Stand Corrected - No Legal Advice or Recommended Course of Action Expressed or Implied

The Constitution - Estate in Trust for the Heirs of Freedom - Local Link
Reply Share
#47
(05-20-2018, 02:48 PM)Heir Wrote: And Ya wonder why history teachers and assorted school curricula denigrate Him so much . To listen to them  He was one Man , THE ONE Man , single - handedly responsible for the War Between the States and Public Sentiment to continue the practice of Involuntary Servitude / Chattel Slavery among the Populace .

The Yankee Federals prevailed and now only the Federals can hold One to Involuntary Servitude / Slavery .

Everybody SING ! ! !

Oh Say Does That Star Strangled Banner Yet Wayy - YAWaavveeee

O're The Land of the FEE and the Home of the SLAVE ?

Last year Yale removed his name from one of their undergraduate collages. After reading what he said, I know the real reason and it wasn't racism.
Reply Share
#48
Did they now  ? Is that the same Yale Boner School that instructs to wash hands after using the Toilet ? They say at Harvard it's taught not to pee or poo on Ones hands .

jk jk . . . old Preppies joke . Funny around the Papered peeps . B S , More S , Piled higher 'n' Deeper .

[Image: serveimage?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmedia.getty...befe2d40f8]
Celebrating Over 25 Years as a Designated " Paper Terrorist " - I Will Stand Corrected - No Legal Advice or Recommended Course of Action Expressed or Implied

The Constitution - Estate in Trust for the Heirs of Freedom - Local Link
Reply Share

Post Thread  Back To Forum
[-]
Quick Reply
Message
Type your reply to this message here.

Please select the number: 1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10