Welcome, Guest

 or  Register
NewsFeed

Snapshots
#41



So. I  was forcibly nudged by my creator to tone it down a few hundred notches.

So be it.

That shared, I will be away for awhile, butt before i go, let me share with you a very nice video of an appreciatour of a mysterious Russian poet.

  TTFN

             Jack
Knock, knock!
Who's there?
Tori.
Tori who?
Tori I bumped into you!

Reply Share
#42
forum sidebar.



^ “ We appreciate any and all concerns for %#jack's creator's emotional and mental stability and or sanity. With that in mind, let's peek on this mornings 'session' and ascertain just what in fact is going on!"


Scene 1. after jack's creator having experienced some sort of emotional excess the day before, the three meet to discuss the situation. Each has his/her own view.


%#jack: To the best of my knowledge, my creator was having a bad day yesterday. A bit of a meltdown actually. He was severely overstressed. Panic Attack? Why? 1dunno1 .
    Jack


%#jack's Creator: Thank you %#jack. Yes I was having a bit of a bad day, I was somewhat uncomfortable butt only a little really. ha. A tempest in the tinest of tiny teapots. Got my s*hit together now. Thank you jack for your limited and somewhat flawed insight.


%#jack: (mutters) panic attack.


%#jack's Creator: was not.


%#jack : was so too ooo


Creator: Not


%#jack: too


Creator: NOT!


%#jack: twas s,,,

Ms. Dr. Finemann: BOYS BOYS. That will be QUITE sufficient. Now please make up.


%#jack: sorrieze


Creator: Sorry


Ms. Dr. Finemann: Thank you


%#jack: You are quite welcome.


(Editor's note; Although conversations of this type may be somewhat... uncommon, Such interactions are in no way disruptive to ongoing social forum operations nor should such, in any way, interfere with day to day forum discourse.)


%#jack: Thank you.


Creator: Yes. Thanks.


Ms. Dr. Finemann: ( her phone quietly chimes moonlight sonata) I think that session went well. I have in fact some conflict with next week's... ?


“Well, there you have it. I will suggest to the boys that only %#jack post in future, as to make it somewhat less confusing.”








%#jack               not that moonlight sonata,^^^^  this moonlight sonata.   vvv   No wonder youre haveing panic attacks!




Knock, knock!
Who's there?
Tori.
Tori who?
Tori I bumped into you!

Reply Share
#43
(02-09-2017, 01:58 PM)%#jack Wrote: forum sidebar.



^ “ We appreciate any and all concerns for %#jack's creator's emotional and mental stability and or sanity. With that in mind, let's peek on this mornings 'session' and ascertain just what in fact is going on!"


Scene 1. after jack's creator having experienced some sort of emotional excess the day before, the three meet to discuss the situation. Each has his/her own view.


%#jack: To the best of my knowledge, my creator was having a bad day yesterday. A bit of a meltdown actually. He was severely overstressed. Panic Attack? Why? 1dunno1 .
    Jack


%#jack's Creator: Thank you %#jack. Yes I was having a bit of a bad day, I was somewhat uncomfortable butt only a little really. ha. A tempest in the tinest of tiny teapots. Got my s*hit together now. Thank you jack for your limited and somewhat flawed insight.


%#jack: (mutters) panic attack.


%#jack's Creator: was not.


%#jack : was so too ooo


Creator: Not


%#jack: too


Creator: NOT!


%#jack: twas s,,,

Ms. Dr. Finemann: BOYS BOYS. That will be QUITE sufficient. Now please make up.


%#jack: sorrieze


Creator: Sorry


Ms. Dr. Finemann: Thank you


%#jack: You are quite welcome.


(Editor's note; Although conversations of this type may be somewhat... uncommon, Such interactions are in no way disruptive to ongoing social forum operations nor should such, in any way, interfere with day to day forum discourse.)


%#jack: Thank you.


Creator: Yes. Thanks.


Ms. Dr. Finemann: ( her phone quietly chimes moonlight sonata) I think that session went well. I have in fact some conflict with next week's... ?


“Well, there you have it. I will suggest to the boys that only %#jack post in future, as to make it somewhat less confusing.”








%#jack               not that moonlight sonata,^^^^  this moonlight sonata.   vvv   No wonder youre haveing panic attacks!





Hugs . Breaks are good Jack,please get some rest and a bit of nature maybe. I know where that part lives all too well. Heartflowers

Reply Share
#44
Hugs . Breaks are good Jack,please get some rest and a bit of nature maybe. I know where that part lives all too.

^^Dear friend,


I noticed your kind post of concern, and I just wanted to set you at ease with respect to the particular above post to which you were referring.

Truthfully I, as a forum poster, am capable of posting some very avante-guard, cutting edgy, over the top forum s*hit.

Butt, as to whether that type of material is appropriate for the 'fringe forum', is something of concern to me.
I always try to taper my material to the respectful appropriate limits of my forum hosts.

AND so, I prolly won't be sharing the forum material I am currently developing. My gut says it isn't mentally profitable for those other posters who participate on the fringe forum and I am respectful of that.


Again, thank you for your concern.


Sincerely yours,


%#jack's creator
Knock, knock!
Who's there?
Tori.
Tori who?
Tori I bumped into you!

Reply Share
#45
here is an example of how you, your average poster, might, analyze a perplexing post.

POSTER VERACITY TEST


( when confronted with a confusing and complex singular post, even-iff it is posted on a poster's singular and selfie-like self-adoring thread, you, the poster, reading said confusing post, are faced with a dilema. What is the nature of this post, what is the intent of the poster, and, is the poster trolling, drunk or dimented. Something other than a 'wtf' or 'go take a very lonn...(x-infinity)...nnng long break' response is required. )


So how do you proceed, as a concientious fringe member?


Do you ignore the post or, do you, actively engage this off putting yet some how sickeningly intriguing post?


Well, iff you wish to engage you, take a very deep breath and then you proceed in a calm, analytical manner.


Firstly you private message the forum moderator on station. Convey to the moderator on duty that you are perplexed by this poster's post and you wish to interact with the poster, all the while with the moderator attentively guarding your back. You convey to the moderator that you will attempt to converse and confront the poster in question and, if said poster gets belligerent or out of control in any way, you will post the secret signal “chop”. (in large red ink ).
This will alert the forum moderator who will then isolate or if necessary, cut the line of communication with the poster additional sending a terse note/command to the effect of “f*uck or sleep it off” depending on the determination of the possibly offensive poster's state.


Having established thus, you now proceed with your interrogation, interaction with said poster.


In this case you are confronted with this confusing post;


forum sidebar.



^ “ We appreciate any and all concerns for %#jack's creator's emotional and mental stability and or sanity. With that in mind, let's peek on this mornings 'session' and ascertain just what in fact is going on!"


Scene 1. after jack's creator having experienced some sort of emotional excess the day before, the three meet to discuss the situation. Each has his/her own view.


%#jack: To the best of my knowledge, my creator was having a bad day yesterday. A bit of a meltdown actually. He was severely over stressed. Panic Attack? Why? [Image: 1dunno1.gif] .
    Jack


%#jack's Creator: Thank you %#jack. Yes I was having a bit of a bad day, I was somewhat uncomfortable butt only a little really. ha. A tempest in the tiniest of tiny teapots. Got my s*hit together now. Thank you jack for your limited and somewhat flawed insight.


%#jack: (mutters) panic attack.


%#jack's Creator: was not.


%#jack : was so too ooo


Creator: Not


%#jack: too


Creator: NOT!


%#jack: twas s,,,

Ms. Dr. Finemann: BOYS BOYS. That will be QUITE sufficient. Now please make up.


%#jack: sorrieze


Creator: Sorry


Ms. Dr. Finemann: Thank you


%#jack: You are quite welcome.


(Editor's note; Although conversations of this type may be somewhat... uncommon, Such interactions are in no way disruptive to ongoing social forum operations nor should such, in any way, interfere with day to day forum discourse.)


%#jack: Thank you.


Creator: Yes. Thanks.


Ms. Dr. Finemann: ( her phone quietly chimes moonlight sonata) I think that session went well. I have in fact some conflict with next week's... ?


Well, there you have it. I will suggest to the boys that only %#jack post in future, as to make it somewhat less confusing.”



Firstly,

Engage the poster.


But, before you do, send a private message of greeting to establish back channel communication.


(No reply to back channel ping. You tried).


OK... so... poster is logged in, he is here.


Offer an initial, friendly, handshake-post...


“Hello there... %#jack's creator? Wonderful day? How are... tricks?”


creator's response “fine”.


“ OK... well, I was somewhat put aback, actually confused by your post (above ) in that you posted your post in several different persons. Can you please explain this post?”

But! before we do this, can you please spell IaMsObErNoW? Case sensitive please? And backward?


WoNrEbOsMaI. Sufficient?


“Perfectly. Thank you”.
(Sobriety now established we now go forward with our poster emotional-sanity capability test.)


“Now, wonderful. If I were to say 'brown' you would say what?


“calliope”


And if I were to say... sky?”


“eggs over easy, heavy on the lard mommy”


“O...K.”


Well, the sanity test component is somewhat...relative, but as the poster is cooperative, coherent, non aggressive not bawling his head off, doxxing threatening... whatever, we can at least be confident that it is safe to proceed and we do not have to post the code word “chop.”


“Now, ….. (you might hesitantly post) I am some what confused as to whom it is exactly that I am addressing now. May you self identify please?”


(editor's note; “note perfunctory syntax^”.)


“ No my friend, third person editor POV is not condusive to intra-personal social forum interaction. Can you address me in another tense please?”


“Note the ease with which the mysterious poster articulates^”.


“No no no. narrative's-voice is still third person. Again?”


Ms. Dr. Finemann: “Is this voice acceptable, oh, our time is nearly expired. I have a two clock next Wednesday.


“Better, but not the first person singular I seek.”


%#jack “Is this first person singular enough???”.


“No, not quite %#jack, you see, you are not actually... a person.              %#jack.”


%#jack's Creator “ All right. What the h*ell do you want?”


“Ah, (you post) much better. But firstly, may we dispense with the foul guttersnipe language please. I do not choose to converse with belligerent street trash vulgarian.” (Hold off on the “chop” command... let's give him a chance to respond.”)


**** long pause. Years go by actually ****


June 16th 2018. The fringe has changed owner operators three times and so has the presidency. President Bernie Sanders presides.


"I didn't actually swear."'Oh all right. What do you want of me?”


THERE. The potentially offensive poster now mentally and emotionally vetted. No moderator was needed, Moderator on duty, you may step down.

The conversation may now proceed.

 As to what in the h*eck the above now fully cleared post was all about... 1dunno1 .





“Either way, all things non-eternal are pointless, as is this asinine post”.


(Narrative voice) ^^^
Knock, knock!
Who's there?
Tori.
Tori who?
Tori I bumped into you!

Reply Share
#46
^^^      chop!!!
Reply Share
#47
I have to read this twice. @jack always gives me something to think about. I am behind on my reading of Snapshots.
Reply Share
#48
thanks Lily,

Heartflowers

           %#jack
Knock, knock!
Who's there?
Tori.
Tori who?
Tori I bumped into you!

Reply Share