Welcome, Guest

 or  Register
NewsFeed

Q Thread Updates/drops/posts - NOT for Q Skeptics.
(02-11-2019, 06:41 AM)DeadpoolLovesYou Wrote:
The only thing Q has posted is leading questions, and the insinuations are correct.  People extrapolate too far and get disappointed, or take a made up date as a deadline.

It's hard to tell if you aren't really in to it what is an actual Q statement and what is somebody else interpreting it.

I cannot agree more! The greatest weakness in the Q method of communication is the enthusiasm of some of his adherents and their tendency to run wild with ideas that are based upon someone else's theory instead of Q. But while it can confuse us, it really sends the bad guys for a loop!

Part of that is due to Q having to transmit information in the form of questions rather than statements. But Q MUST do it that way to skirt classification and leaking laws and regulations. Information that is "clear"comes in direct statements. So when we receive a drop that is all questions or questions that are answered by another question, we can know that the information is either privileged or closely held.
Latest Bread on 8: http://qest.us/qcatalog
Q abbreviations thread- https://the-fringe.com/thread-q_anon_abb...#pid399767
Q drops- All the Q posts in one place - https://qanon.pub/
The Coming Storm- https://imgur.com/a/DTeK7-
Reply Share
From 8:

This is on the front page of the NYT's this morning.
They're actually going to claim the 'heart' of the Mueller probe is some supposed deal between the Trump campaign & Putin gov't over easing of Russian sanctions for the invasion of Ukraine.


[Image: Dz-IG9p-PVYAALYYr.jpg]
Don't believe anything you see on TV or read on the internet. - Sir Isaac Newton. [Image: fTAd1Xk.gif]
Link to Q Maps https://qmap.pub/  Link to Qanon.pub https://qanon.pub/index.html Link to PF https://8ch.net/patriotsfight/res/62.html Link to PF2: https://8ch.net/patriotsfight/res/440.html
Reply Share
This story is only partially correct.

Other sources are saying that ISIS got hammered by airstrikes from more than one Country.

https://twitter.com/Slappy_Kincaid/statu...6924348417
Don't believe anything you see on TV or read on the internet. - Sir Isaac Newton. [Image: fTAd1Xk.gif]
Link to Q Maps https://qmap.pub/  Link to Qanon.pub https://qanon.pub/index.html Link to PF https://8ch.net/patriotsfight/res/62.html Link to PF2: https://8ch.net/patriotsfight/res/440.html
Reply Share
Big Mike praises his Underlord.

https://twitter.com/Slappy_Kincaid/statu...4929979392
Don't believe anything you see on TV or read on the internet. - Sir Isaac Newton. [Image: fTAd1Xk.gif]
Link to Q Maps https://qmap.pub/  Link to Qanon.pub https://qanon.pub/index.html Link to PF https://8ch.net/patriotsfight/res/62.html Link to PF2: https://8ch.net/patriotsfight/res/440.html
Reply Share
(02-10-2019, 02:42 PM)Karu Wrote: https://twitter.com/JacobAWohl/status/10...2905978880

As this entire Twitter account says, there’s NO proof of life.

And with SCOTUS handing down rulings, some with 5-4 margins, I’d say it PAST TIME to DEMAMD PROOF OF LIFE

As one tweet says, if she’s well enough to attend a concert she’s well enough to show up for work
Reply Share
(02-10-2019, 04:24 PM)Slappy Kincaid Wrote:
(02-10-2019, 04:11 PM)Karu Wrote: [Image: 8xmFhpX.png]

RBG was the blockade? Wall build by military and spygate heading to SC?

I don't think so. If there is a blockade in the SC it is Roberts. RBG is a known quantity.

The bigger issue is how can she be voting but not be seen publicly ?
She must be aware of the persistent rumours which could be easily resolved by showing herself.

You would think that one of the other Justices would have confirmed or denied contact with her.

We know that Roberts is compromised over his adopted children - but would it be enough to provide this type of cover?

(02-11-2019, 11:04 AM)Deplorable Michele B Wrote:
(02-10-2019, 02:42 PM)Karu Wrote: https://twitter.com/JacobAWohl/status/10...2905978880

As this entire Twitter account says, there’s NO proof of life.

And with SCOTUS handing down rulings, some with 5-4 margins, I’d say it PAST TIME to DEMAMD PROOF OF LIFE

As one tweet says, if she’s well enough to attend a concert she’s well enough to show up for work
Don't believe anything you see on TV or read on the internet. - Sir Isaac Newton. [Image: fTAd1Xk.gif]
Link to Q Maps https://qmap.pub/  Link to Qanon.pub https://qanon.pub/index.html Link to PF https://8ch.net/patriotsfight/res/62.html Link to PF2: https://8ch.net/patriotsfight/res/440.html
Aquarius, bigD111, Billy, Hickory, Karu  likes this!
Reply Share
40,000? Maybe just a tad more...

https://twitter.com/KTHopkins/status/109...2490537985
Don't believe anything you see on TV or read on the internet. - Sir Isaac Newton. [Image: fTAd1Xk.gif]
Link to Q Maps https://qmap.pub/  Link to Qanon.pub https://qanon.pub/index.html Link to PF https://8ch.net/patriotsfight/res/62.html Link to PF2: https://8ch.net/patriotsfight/res/440.html
Reply Share
(02-10-2019, 03:44 PM)Slappy Kincaid Wrote: https://twitter.com/POTUSPress/status/10...8043915265
https://twitter.com/POTUSPress/status/10...8819791872

Ooooh! Tightning the noose- tighter and tighter. Like a vise. Until there is no escape from the truth!

All things we’ve been saying- but they had to roll those questions and “theories” out more slowly, for the normies.
Reply Share
(02-11-2019, 10:25 AM)Slappy Kincaid Wrote: From 8:

This is on the front page of the NYT's this morning.
They're actually going to claim the 'heart' of the Mueller probe is some supposed deal between the Trump campaign & Putin gov't over easing of Russian sanctions for the invasion of Ukraine.


[Image: Dz-IG9p-PVYAALYYr.jpg]

Putin bad, orange man bad, but nothing about Ukraine's involvement in this whole debacle which is going to turn out to be quite large I think and why they keep pushing the Russia narrative.
Reply Share
(02-10-2019, 04:24 PM)Slappy Kincaid Wrote:
(02-10-2019, 04:11 PM)Karu Wrote: [Image: 8xmFhpX.png]

RBG was the blockade? Wall build by military and spygate heading to SC?

I don't think so. If there is a blockade in the SC it is Roberts. RBG is a known quantity.

The bigger issue is how can she be voting but not be seen publicly ?
She must be aware of the persistent rumours which could be easily resolved by showing herself.

You would think that one of the other Justices would have confirmed or denied contact with her.

We know that Roberts is compromised over his adopted children - but would it be enough to provide this type of cover?

I don’t know what C. Justice Roberts’ issue is, but once Trump installs another justice, he will be rendered unnecessary. Maybe then he’ll pull a Lindsey Graham and fly right again?
Reply Share