Welcome, Guest

 or  Register
NewsFeed

NXIVM Updates
(04-14-2019, 08:17 AM)MysticPizza Wrote: Hell hath no fury  popnana

Woman Scorned . . . exactly .


.
Celebrating Over 30 Years as a " Designated Paper Terrorist " - I Will Stand Corrected - No Legal Advice or Recommended Course of Action Expressed or Implied

The Constitution - Estate in Trust for the Heirs of Freedom - Local Link
Reply Share
@Fritzy Ritz This tweet is NOT about Boeing! Wink

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/stat...5721223168
Q abbreviations thread- https://the-fringe.com/thread-q_anon_abb...#pid399767
Q drops- All the Q posts in one place - https://qanon.pub/  The Coming Storm- https://imgur.com/a/DTeK7- Q Tentacles thread- https://the-fringe.com/thread-q_tentacle...s?page=234  
Reply Share
(04-13-2019, 08:52 PM)Deepsouthlady Wrote: I tried looking this up to see what i could. Found this:      http://www.nxivm.com/project/education/
On the nxivm website. The rainbow cultural garden title is clickable, but when i try to go to it it gives me a website unavaible/busy message. Maybe u will have better luck.

@Fritzy Ritz thanx so much for all u poat on this thread. Its a great help to me. I dont hqve alot of time to read through sites to find info about it. Teaching my son the bill of rights and dec of independence. I qm making him memorize them. Its taking up alot of time.

We all do what we can. You are doing a big job raising your son to know the difference between right and wrong and to appreciate this country. That's our future and you are contributing to it, so thank you as well! Hugs
_____________________________
MALA - Make America Laugh Again
Deepsouthlady, Heir, MysticPizza, Sassy  likes this!
Reply Share
All of the Jane Does are getting to be a bit confusing. For example, Jane Doe #2 is currently in Guadalaja, and is the one who was 15 years old when photographic collateral was gathered on her. Now, Keith Raniere's defense team wants her to come here to testify but wants to grant her "safe passage" in the US (apparently, some of the Mexium folks are nervous about being arrested) and if that can't be guaranteed, they want her to testify on camera. A lot of supeonas have been issued to the Mexiums, but of course, there is no jurisdiction there that binds them to appear.

Nonetheless, this Jane Doe#2 testimony is apparentlly a delicate legal situation.

From the Frank Report:
Quote:One of the witnesses Raniere wants to bring forward may be Jane Doe #2, now 29, who, when she was 15 years old, was allegedly photographed nude for Raniere’s so-called “studies.”

This is a damning piece of evidence and forms a major part of the predicate acts – and may form the nucleus of subsequent charges in the Northern District of child porn and sexual exploitation of a minor – after the upcoming trial in the Eastern District.

If Jane Doe #2, who is now in Guadalajara and under the control of Nxivm leader Jack Levy, decides to testify for Raniere, Frank Report will likely reveal her identity.

She is now an adult woman, was alleged to be a First Line Slave Master at DOS, and despite her victimization in youth – it is now high time for her to break free of the monster or pay the cost that other adults pay for supporting a madman.

This is especially true if she plans to testify [perjure herself] that she was not 15 at the time the nude pictures were taken but actually 17. The point of that testimony is that if she was 17, it is no longer child porn.

Raniere’s attorney, Marc Agnifilo, has retained a forensic computer analyst to cast doubt on the authenticity, age and the chain-of-custody of the Jane Doe #2 images.

https://frankreport.com/2019/04/13/ranie...ere-taken/
_____________________________
MALA - Make America Laugh Again
Deepsouthlady, Sassy  likes this!
Reply Share
There's NXIVM info in this vid, so I'm including it here.



_____________________________
MALA - Make America Laugh Again
Reply Share
Frank's got an update with regard to those NXies in Mexico. This is his opinion:

Quote:Keith’s Motion To Obtain Testimony From Foreign Witnesses Via Closed-Circuit TVs
I can’t see it being granted. The main reason is that witnesses outside the jurisdiction of the US Courts, testifying on TV, have no accountability.
What is the punishment for perjury? Extradition?
What are the means of identification of TV witnesses? Their word alone or showing some ID on TV?
What if the witness wants to stop testifying at any time? Can she just literally pull the plug?
What would the judge do to stop contempt of court? If she continued to testify about things that were sustained after an objection, how could the judge gag her?
Would he unplug the TV on his end?
Too many problems, not enough control. It won’t be granted.
If Keith wants Mexican witnesses, he will have to produce them and a lot of them won’t dare come to the USA – which puts rather a damper on the Raniere defense.

Today's article on pending motions that are likely to be ruled on this week: https://frankreport.com/2019/04/14/nine-...pproaches/
_____________________________
MALA - Make America Laugh Again
bigD111, Deepsouthlady, Heir, Sassy  likes this!
Reply Share
Well, here's some delightful poop frosting on a shit cake .... Keith Raniere has prison groupies. He's out of the Special Housing Unit (where he was temporarily moved because he kept having "accidents" with the other prisoners -- apparently his face was falling into other people's fists or something...) and now back with his homies in the Sexual Offenders Unit. There is a commissary where prisoners can buy things they need/want in prison, and a couple of gals who have been coming to visit him regularly may be his new benefactors.

According to the Frank Report....

Quote:Both women are described as being in their 50s, blond, very attractive and very skinny.

So, while The Vanguard may have expanded the age-range of women that he’ll spend time with, they still need to be attractive and thin if they expect him to hang around for very long.

Raniere has bragged to some of his fellow inmates that both women contacted him after they read about him in local newspapers (They never visit him at the same time).

full story here: https://frankreport.com/2019/04/15/vangu...-gal-pals/

Facepalm
_____________________________
MALA - Make America Laugh Again
bigD111  likes this!
Reply Share
Radio show interview with Frank Parlato ... interview starts around 4:55

http://renseradioarchives.com/archives/c...041519.mp3

The first part of this is information most of you know (with the possible exception of the basis for the NXIVM name) but right around the 40 minute mark, he starts talking about the Clintons and also the Rainbow Cultural Garden which, yes, is also in New Zealand and fully operational.
_____________________________
MALA - Make America Laugh Again
bigD111  likes this!
Reply Share
The judge is ruling on all kinds of motions this week -- one of them is this:

Quote:The prosecution has sought approval from U.S. District Court Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis to admit evidence of “uncharged criminal acts and other acts committed by the defendants and other conspirators”.

If the prosecution’s motion is approved, it will be allowed to introduce such evidence to prove:
– The existence of the criminal enterprise that is the basis for Count One: Racketeering Conspiracy and Count Two: Racketeering in the second superseding indictment;
– The defendants participated in a pattern of criminal activity; and
– The defendants were members of – and participated in – the criminal enterprise.

More details on what this specifically includes are here: https://frankreport.com/2019/04/16/prose...nvictions/

My question is: would this be a normal practice in a trial? I always thought that trials had to stick to evidence presented strictly related to whatever the charges were, as defined within precisely defined parameters. For example, if someone is being tried for selling drugs, you can't bring up the fact that they have 400 overdue parking tickets in the same trial. Or can you? I dunno.

Seems to me if they get to introduce all this other material, there is no way in hell that the defense can win. And as much as I'd like to see that happen, it also makes me nervous if it's setting some kind of weird precendent.

@Heir ? Can you help translate this with the implications?
_____________________________
MALA - Make America Laugh Again
bigD111  likes this!
Reply Share
(04-16-2019, 09:34 PM)Fritzy Ritz Wrote: The judge is ruling on all kinds of motions this week -- one of them is this:

Quote:The prosecution has sought approval from U.S. District Court Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis to admit evidence of “uncharged criminal acts and other acts committed by the defendants and other conspirators”.

If the prosecution’s motion is approved, it will be allowed to introduce such evidence to prove:
– The existence of the criminal enterprise that is the basis for Count One: Racketeering Conspiracy and Count Two: Racketeering in the second superseding indictment;
– The defendants participated in a pattern of criminal activity; and
– The defendants were members of – and participated in – the criminal enterprise.

More details on what this specifically includes are here: https://frankreport.com/2019/04/16/prose...nvictions/

My question is: would this be a normal practice in a trial? I always thought that trials had to stick to evidence presented strictly related to whatever the charges were, as defined within precisely defined parameters. For example, if someone is being tried for selling drugs, you can't bring up the fact that they have 400 overdue parking tickets in the same trial. Or can you? I dunno.

Seems to me if they get to introduce all this other material, there is no way in hell that the defense can win. And as much as I'd like to see that happen, it also makes me nervous if it's setting some kind of weird precendent.

@Heir ? Can you help translate this with the implications?

If RICO is what they are pursuing, it is pretty much open season.
"Why don't you just speak with your words instead of your damn dirty lies?"
~Louise Belcher.
bigD111, Fritzy Ritz  likes this!
Reply Share