Welcome, Guest

 or  Register
NewsFeed

No to gay adoptions gay men not equipped to be mothers!
#21
He should be put to death Yeah3

And I agree with conservative posters, children should be raised by mother and father. Traditional nuclear families are the best. My parents were great and they're still together.
"You have the demeanor of a perverted child. Grow up!" - Ukshep

Adam1  Chuckle
Reply Share
#22
(10-11-2017, 01:34 PM)MysticPizza Wrote:
(10-11-2017, 01:29 PM)KOMMA Wrote:
(10-11-2017, 01:18 PM)MysticPizza Wrote: He sounds like an isolated nut case to me. Not everyone,gay or straight,is mentally or emotionally equipped to adopt and that should be the highest priority,not money.

The vetting in the UK is extensive and can take years for adoption. However, social workers don't learn what medics don't learn during their training, and that is the the nutrients that the mother has during her pregnancy impacts upon the child she carries. So for instance if a mother lacks a particular nutrient, it can impact upon the quality of their eyesight and a lot more. Hence, children born in massive poverty, impacts on the quality of the health of the child. Some children are born with unseen disabilities due to what the mother consumed during pregnancy. Adopting a child is much more than most people realise.

I agree with you there. More care should have been given in adopting this child out. Drug addicted new borns lack so very much nutritionally which damages their brains in different ways.
On the other hand,I have yet to meet an 18 month old who couldn't pull a 'proper diva strop' at the drop f a hat. They aren't bad,their nervous systems are not fully developed and since they can't put their thoughts into words,they have fits. Natural. For a child like Elsie,more so and they adoption agency should have shown much more care.

All of the gays that I have met during my life had tremendous difficulty managing their own lives, (male and female) let alone cope with any child that goes through their natural processes. Plato found the same, and he said that the best job for gay men was the military as they were so protective of other men. I saw a couple of gay women in action with a child, and their priority was each other and not the child. The little girl sat there looking forlorn while her mother was cuddling her girlfriend.
The Virgin stood with 60 just ones against Obama.

http://www.earlyjewishwritings.com/apoczephaniah.html

Now the departed righteous dwell in a place of perpetual light, it's the only way that we can live a healthy life.  Heartflowers

Code:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9OPKSZyRPFQ
Reply Share
#23
(10-11-2017, 11:05 AM)KOMMA Wrote: I suggest you look at the science on the brain of a mother and compare it with the brain of someone who is not.

How nice it would be if the science were true, that all mothers are caring and protect their children. However I know for a fact it just isn't true. For 10 years I've lived across the road from a young family, and it is distressingly dysfunctional. The mother screams at her children constantly. The elder girl tried to take her own life a year ago and is now a pregnant 14 year old. The 7 year old lives in an abandoned 10' camper. Any attempts to help are rejected and the children have been removed and returned by the gov several times. Their horses are crippled from lack of farrier attention, one is walking on his coffin bones from hoof rot that has destroyed the nerves and ligaments. The dogs are chained 24/7. But according to science, she's got the brain of a biological mother. She is not fit to be a parent.
Perhaps pregnancy does alter brain chemistry. But it sure as hell does not guarantee the woman will be a fit mother.
When life knocks you flat on your face roll over and look at the stars.
Reply Share
#24
(10-11-2017, 04:08 PM)Shadow Wrote:
(10-11-2017, 11:05 AM)KOMMA Wrote: I suggest you look at the science on the brain of a mother and compare it with the brain of someone who is not.

How nice it would be if the science were true, that all mothers are caring and protect their children. However I know for a fact it just isn't true. For 10 years I've lived across the road from a young family, and it is distressingly dysfunctional. The mother screams at her children constantly. The elder girl tried to take her own life a year ago and is now a pregnant 14 year old. The 7 year old lives in an abandoned 10' camper. Any attempts to help are rejected and the children have been removed and returned by the gov several times. Their horses are crippled from lack of farrier attention, one is walking on his coffin bones from hoof rot that has destroyed the nerves and ligaments. The dogs are chained 24/7. But according to science, she's got the brain of a biological mother.  She is not fit to be a parent.
Perhaps pregnancy does alter brain chemistry. But it sure as hell does not guarantee the woman will be a fit mother.

I agree, and for the same reason as you. The reason is, this is what I have seen with my own eyes.

A few years back science also came out with claiming to have proven that "breast milk is a "carcinogen".

No disrespect intended to anyone.
No one can resist the truth wrapped in a good joke.

Reply Share
#25
(10-11-2017, 04:08 PM)Shadow Wrote: [quote='KOMMA' pid='211511' dateline='1507734346']
I suggest you look at the science on the brain of a mother and compare it with the brain of someone who is not.

Quote:How nice it would be if the science were true, that all mothers are caring and protect their children.

Did you read the science and look at the brain scans, brain scans confirm that the brain of a woman that has become pregnant is different to a woman that hasn't given birth.

Quote:However I know for a fact it just isn't true. For 10 years I've lived across the road from a young family, and it is distressingly dysfunctional.

What do they eat!

Perhaps they should have brain scans to see if there is any physical disability, for all you know the mother you wrote about could be undiagnosed asperger's.
The Virgin stood with 60 just ones against Obama.

http://www.earlyjewishwritings.com/apoczephaniah.html

Now the departed righteous dwell in a place of perpetual light, it's the only way that we can live a healthy life.  Heartflowers

Code:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9OPKSZyRPFQ
Reply Share
#26
(10-11-2017, 04:13 PM)snowglobe Wrote: I agree, and for the same reason as you. The reason is, this is what I have seen with my own eyes.

A few years back science also came out with claiming to have proven that "breast milk is a "carcinogen".

No disrespect intended to anyone.

Do you know the difference between brain scans and studies!
The Virgin stood with 60 just ones against Obama.

http://www.earlyjewishwritings.com/apoczephaniah.html

Now the departed righteous dwell in a place of perpetual light, it's the only way that we can live a healthy life.  Heartflowers

Code:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9OPKSZyRPFQ
Reply Share
#27
(10-11-2017, 04:21 PM)KOMMA Wrote:
(10-11-2017, 04:13 PM)snowglobe Wrote: I agree, and for the same reason as you. The reason is, this is what I have seen with my own eyes.

A few years back science also came out with claiming to have proven that "breast milk is a "carcinogen".

No disrespect intended to anyone.

Do you know the difference between brain scans and studies!

Is your intention to be insulting?
No one can resist the truth wrapped in a good joke.

Reply Share
#28
My mother , my uncle, my cousin and my nephew, were all adopted, by beautiful mothers, who filled them with love and cared for them so tenderly, even more so if they had actually birthed them..

There is no difference between a mother who birthed and didn’t.. fuck science.. as if that means anything..
Reply Share
#29
(10-11-2017, 01:53 PM)KOMMA Wrote:
(10-11-2017, 01:34 PM)MysticPizza Wrote:
(10-11-2017, 01:29 PM)KOMMA Wrote: The vetting in the UK is extensive and can take years for adoption. However, social workers don't learn what medics don't learn during their training, and that is the the nutrients that the mother has during her pregnancy impacts upon the child she carries. So for instance if a mother lacks a particular nutrient, it can impact upon the quality of their eyesight and a lot more. Hence, children born in massive poverty, impacts on the quality of the health of the child. Some children are born with unseen disabilities due to what the mother consumed during pregnancy. Adopting a child is much more than most people realise.

I agree with you there. More care should have been given in adopting this child out. Drug addicted new borns lack so very much nutritionally which damages their brains in different ways.
On the other hand,I have yet to meet an 18 month old who couldn't pull a 'proper diva strop' at the drop f a hat. They aren't bad,their nervous systems are not fully developed and since they can't put their thoughts into words,they have fits. Natural. For a child like Elsie,more so and they adoption agency should have shown much more care.

All of the gays that I have met during my life had tremendous difficulty managing their own lives, (male and female) let alone cope with any child that goes through their natural processes. Plato found the same, and he said that the best job for gay men was the military as they were so protective of other men. I saw a couple of gay women in action with a child, and their priority was each other and not the child. The little girl sat there looking forlorn while her mother was cuddling her girlfriend.

[Image: GcCKYPm.gif]
Reply Share
#30
The reality is, filicides happen with depressing regularity in the US. And mothers are almost as likely to be the killers as fathers.

Average number of children murdered, by parents, per year in USA = 500

Almost 72% of those killed by their own parents were 6 years old or younger.
And one-third of the victims were just babies under 1 year of age.

More than 42% of the killers in these crimes were mothers, with fathers making up about 57% of those who killed their own offspring.
Cheryl Meyer, co-author of several books on the subject, said it's probable that a mother kills a child somewhere in the US once every three days.

90% of the victims were the parents biological offspring

Only 10% of the victims were killed by their step-parents. That means 90% of the victims were the biological sons or daughters of the killer. And sons (52%) were more likely to be killed than daughters (38%).


Synopsis compiled by me from a report on the below study:
Toward a more holistic understanding of filicide: A multidisciplinary analysis of 32 years of U.S. arrest data
"I don't know everything, I know just enough to know that I know nothing - which is just a little more than those who think they know anything!"
Reply Share

Post Thread  Back To Forum
[-]
Quick Reply
Message
Type your reply to this message here.

Please select the number: 4
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10