Welcome, Guest

 or  Register
NewsFeed

IMPEACH TRUMP !!!
#21
(09-24-2019, 09:17 PM)Ravenage Wrote: Ed Henry reporting on Hannity that the Intel Community IG has found that the second hand info whistleblower had political bias against the President...bias in favor of a rival candidate against the President.  He was told this by a senior official and also told that there is no smoking gun in the transcript pointing out any wrong-doing by the President.

Trump Ukraine “Whistleblower,” Sue Gordon, Is
Long Time CIA Employee
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_conti...UJz0CBxzco

AND

[Image: laymn1w.jpg]
Never give up.
Firefly, Frigg, Kels, Ravenage  likes this!
Reply Share
#22
Trump's new video about impeachment

https://twitter.com/i/status/1176610391058722816
Never give up.
Frigg, Ravenage  likes this!
Reply Share
#23

What???!!

JUST IN: DOJ Ends Investigation of Tony Podesta WITHOUT CHARGES


(Southern District of New York federal prosecutors)

So, well-connected Democrats can get away with crimes related to their efforts in Ukraine, but President Trump’s phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, which is well within his Constitutional powers under Article II is grounds for impeachment ???

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/09...t-charges/
Never give up.
Crange Standy, Firefly, Frigg, Heir, Ravenage  likes this!
Reply Share
#24
Pinning because Trump.

Because of what she said and did, if the House doesn’t go all the way, it will be a political disaster. Either failing to take a vote on articles of impeachment, or failing to get enough votes among her majority to pass any articles, would be seen as a political exoneration for Trump, likely leading to his re-election.

If all that weren’t risky enough, consider another scenario. If House Dems do impeach Trump on grounds that much of the public sees as flimsy and concocted, they could win the battle and lose the war. Indeed, no matter what the House does, there is a next-to-zero chance the GOP controlled Senate would convict the president absent clear and convincing “high crimes and misdemeanors.”

Pelosi knew all that since January, when she became Speaker, which is why she kept resisting the impeachers. But her surrender proved again that her party can’t quit 2016. Like generals fighting the last war, she and they are now committed to taking their sore-loser grievances to 2020 voters.
moarrrr @ linkypoo


https://nypost.com/2019/09/24/goodwin-pe...verything/
Firefly, Kels  likes this!
Reply Share
#25
(09-25-2019, 06:41 AM)Mmmmkay_ultra Wrote: Pinning because Trump.

Because of what she said and did, if the House doesn’t go all the way, it will be a political disaster. Either failing to take a vote on articles of impeachment, or failing to get enough votes among her majority to pass any articles, would be seen as a political exoneration for Trump, likely leading to his re-election.

If all that weren’t risky enough, consider another scenario. If House Dems do impeach Trump on grounds that much of the public sees as flimsy and concocted, they could win the battle and lose the war. Indeed, no matter what the House does, there is a next-to-zero chance the GOP controlled Senate would convict the president absent clear and convincing “high crimes and misdemeanors.”

Pelosi knew all that since January, when she became Speaker, which is why she kept resisting the impeachers. But her surrender proved again that her party can’t quit 2016. Like generals fighting the last war, she and they are now committed to taking their sore-loser grievances to 2020 voters.
moarrrr @ linkypoo


https://nypost.com/2019/09/24/goodwin-pe...verything/

Way I read is that she was supposed to call for a vote upon calling for an official inquiry to be able to even open and official inquiry.

This bitch isn't following the rules and was blathering on about the formation of our Republic and our Constitution while usurping it at the very same time.
Crange Standy, Firefly  likes this!
Reply Share
#26
(09-24-2019, 04:14 PM)Lily Wrote: Fancy wording in that article:  Nancy Pelosi is reportedly set to announce an official impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump on Tuesday Notice it said nothing about impeaching. Instead the Dems are going to form a committee and are going to have meetings, waste money and time, plus subpoena people. This is the whole Russiagate waste of time and money all over again.

As an American I am pissed off. All of Congress has spent the last 2.5 years wasting time and failing to put the American people first. The country is falling apart while they play "let's get Trump."

Let's not forget how much of OUR money they wasted accomplishing - nothing. Scream1
Live and learn to see what's really in front of you and it'll be fine.
Kels, Lily, Ravenage  likes this!
Reply Share
#27
(09-24-2019, 10:11 PM)Messregne Wrote:
(09-24-2019, 09:17 PM)Ravenage Wrote: Ed Henry reporting on Hannity that the Intel Community IG has found that the second hand info whistleblower had political bias against the President...bias in favor of a rival candidate against the President.  He was told this by a senior official and also told that there is no smoking gun in the transcript pointing out any wrong-doing by the President.

Trump Ukraine “Whistleblower,” Sue Gordon, Is
Long Time CIA Employee
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_conti...UJz0CBxzco

AND

[Image: laymn1w.jpg]

You posted this 10 hours ago and FOX News just got around to mentioning it approx 20 minutes ago on F&F.

Pathetic. Chuckle
Crange Standy, Firefly, Kels  likes this!
Reply Share
#28
(09-25-2019, 08:14 AM)Ravenage Wrote:
(09-25-2019, 06:41 AM)Mmmmkay_ultra Wrote: Pinning because Trump.

Because of what she said and did, if the House doesn’t go all the way, it will be a political disaster. Either failing to take a vote on articles of impeachment, or failing to get enough votes among her majority to pass any articles, would be seen as a political exoneration for Trump, likely leading to his re-election.

If all that weren’t risky enough, consider another scenario. If House Dems do impeach Trump on grounds that much of the public sees as flimsy and concocted, they could win the battle and lose the war. Indeed, no matter what the House does, there is a next-to-zero chance the GOP controlled Senate would convict the president absent clear and convincing “high crimes and misdemeanors.”

Pelosi knew all that since January, when she became Speaker, which is why she kept resisting the impeachers. But her surrender proved again that her party can’t quit 2016. Like generals fighting the last war, she and they are now committed to taking their sore-loser grievances to 2020 voters.
moarrrr @ linkypoo


https://nypost.com/2019/09/24/goodwin-pe...verything/

Way I read is that she was supposed to call for a vote upon calling for an official inquiry to be able to even open and official inquiry.

This bitch isn't following the rules and was blathering on about the formation of our Republic and our Constitution while usurping it at the very same time.

They just want to tell us that we don't know the rules are.
Ravenage  likes this!
Reply Share
#29
(Psssst - Hey Nancy - 'Noos' Gingrich?)

https://twitter.com/TrumpGirlOnFire/stat...7998050305
Live and learn to see what's really in front of you and it'll be fine.
Reply Share
#30
(What took so long? Hmmmm?)

https://twitter.com/heatherjones333/stat...0489882625
Live and learn to see what's really in front of you and it'll be fine.
Kels  likes this!
Reply Share