Welcome, Guest

 or  Register
NewsFeed

Have you written your senator to vote yes on "No Taxpayer Funding for Abortions"
#1
H.R. 7 the "No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion and Abortion Insurance Full Disclosure Act of 2017" having already passed the house, and now only needs to pass in the senate before being signed into law by Trump!

Have you written your senator yet to get this legislation passed?

https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-cong...ill/7/text

a little info from the bill....

"Ҥ 301. Prohibition on funding for abortions
“No funds authorized or appropriated by Federal law, and none of the funds in any trust fund to which funds are authorized or appropriated by Federal law, shall be expended for any abortion.


Ҥ 302. Prohibition on funding for health benefits plans that cover abortion
“None of the funds authorized or appropriated by Federal law, and none of the funds in any trust fund to which funds are authorized or appropriated by Federal law, shall be expended for health benefits coverage that includes coverage of abortion.


Ҥ 303. Limitation on Federal facilities and employees
“No health care service furnished—

“(1) by or in a health care facility owned or operated by the Federal Government; or

“(2) by any physician or other individual employed by the Federal Government to provide health care services within the scope of the physician’s or individual’s employment,

may include abortion."
Reply Share
#2
Well, I already got a response back from one of my senators!

"Thank you for your recent correspondence regarding abortion. As your voice in Washington, I appreciate being made aware of your concerns.



Throughout my service in public office, I have taken an ardent stand protecting the life of the unborn. Legalized abortion takes the lives of more than one million unborn children each year, robbing this nation of vast potential. Moreover, it destroys some of our nation's most cherished values: family, responsibility, and commitment.



As an effort to protect innocent life and fight for those who can’t, I have decided to support multiple pieces of legislation this Congress. I am once again an original cosponsor of S.184, a bill to prohibit taxpayer funded abortions. This bill will make a permanent change to the law and close existing loopholes, prohibiting taxpayer dollars from being used in elective abortions. It will also require that insurance companies disclose whether abortions are covered by their policies, making it possible for consumers to choose not to pay against their conscience when purchasing health insurance. This bill is the companion to H.R.7, which passed the House of Representatives on January 24, 2017.



I have also cosponsored S. 231, the Life at Conception Act, recognizing that life begins at conception. This bill declares that the right to life guaranteed by the Constitution is vested in each human being at all stages of life, including the moment at which an individual comes into being.



Another important piece of legislation I am cosponsoring this Congress is S. 220, the Born-Alive Abortion Survivor Protection Act, which would require health practitioners to provide the same care for a child born alive after an abortion or attempted abortion as would be offered to any other child of the same gestational age that is born alive.



In many states, parents must give consent for medical procedures, tattoos, and even ear piercings. It does not make sense that a minor could have an abortion, which is a surgical procedure, without her parents being notified. This is why I am an original cosponsor of S.224, a bill that prohibits taking minors across State lines to circumvent laws requiring the involvement of parents in abortion decisions, by requiring parents be notified before an abortion can be conducted on an out-of-state minor.



I am also extremely grateful that President Trump has advocated for the unborn during his presidency. One of his first actions was to reinstate the Mexico City policy, which prohibits international non-profits from receiving federal funding if they perform or promote abortions. President Trump also signed H.J. Res 43, a resolution of disapproval under the Congressional Review Act that repeals a Department of Health and Human Services rule that blocks the ability of states to withhold funding from abortion providers like Planned Parenthood. I was an original cosponsor of this resolution and was proud to protect the rights of states to block funding to Planned Parenthood.



As your Senator, I will continue to speak up for those who cannot speak for themselves. I will be a supporter of pro-life legislation as it is brought before the Senate for consideration and will work to defeat pro-abortion legislation. Our government has both a moral and constitutional obligation to protect the sanctity of human life."

Now we just need to hold their feet to the fire!
Reply Share
#3
What would the feds be doing if not murdering children?
Reply Share
#4
(02-17-2018, 11:27 AM)Dire_effects Wrote: What would the feds be doing if not murdering children?

What?

I am missing your point, maybe reword it a bit?
Reply Share
#5
(02-17-2018, 11:45 AM)KillTheCarnage Wrote:
(02-17-2018, 11:27 AM)Dire_effects Wrote: What would the feds be doing if not murdering children?

What?

I am missing your point, maybe reword it a bit?

Fair enough.

The feds have argued hard and long for PP.

The feds in their history have always shot up children or even burned them alive in stand-offs.

In war the feds operate in such a way that children are murdered, even if that means using DU.

Killing kids is a sport to the feds.
KillTheCarnage  likes this!
Reply Share
#6
(02-17-2018, 12:35 PM)Dire_effects Wrote:
(02-17-2018, 11:45 AM)KillTheCarnage Wrote:
(02-17-2018, 11:27 AM)Dire_effects Wrote: What would the feds be doing if not murdering children?

What?

I am missing your point, maybe reword it a bit?

Fair enough.

The feds have argued hard and long for PP.

The feds in their history have always shot up children or even burned them alive in stand-offs.

In war the feds operate in such a way that children are murdered, even if that means using DU.

Killing kids is a sport to the feds.

Thanks, and yes I understand.
Dire_effects  likes this!
Reply Share