Welcome, Guest

 or  Register
NewsFeed

Get Smart! Epispde 52
#81
(12-06-2018, 02:14 PM)Dark Moon Wrote: Get Smart Season 2 Episode 22 - Smart Fit the Battle of Jericho
https://watchseries.unblocked.gdn/episod...2_e22.html

Just finished watching it. Interesting to say the least. Highly possible and probable.

There was supposedly an alternative ending to that episode, but I've only seen one of them so I don't know if that is valid or not. Did the episode you watched actually have an explosion at the end?
The Author of this Post assumes no Responsibility Or Liability, nor makes any Warranty or Guarantee of the Accuracy, or Validity of material Presented in this Post. Material Contained or Refered To in this Post is presented by Twitchy as Literary Material Only and is for Entertainment Purposes Only. This Material IS Not Intended to be Read, Inferred, or Interpreted as Information, Advice, News, Instruction, or otherwise Factual Information.
Frigg  likes this!
Reply Share
#82
(12-06-2018, 02:26 PM)twitchy Wrote:
(12-06-2018, 02:14 PM)Dark Moon Wrote: Get Smart Season 2 Episode 22 - Smart Fit the Battle of Jericho
https://watchseries.unblocked.gdn/episod...2_e22.html

Just finished watching it. Interesting to say the least. Highly possible and probable.

There was supposedly an alternative ending to that episode, but I've only seen one of them so I don't know if that is valid or not. Did the episode you watched actually have an explosion at the end?

No explosion at the end but I did enjoy the "phone" sandwich. Chuckle

What you have to ask yourself is, how many building's are pre-prepared for demo in the usa according to agenda from 50/60 years ago?

Crazy or what?...
Frigg  likes this!
Reply Share
#83
(12-06-2018, 02:33 PM)DMnli Wrote:
(12-06-2018, 02:26 PM)twitchy Wrote:
(12-06-2018, 02:14 PM)Dark Moon Wrote: Get Smart Season 2 Episode 22 - Smart Fit the Battle of Jericho
https://watchseries.unblocked.gdn/episod...2_e22.html

Just finished watching it. Interesting to say the least. Highly possible and probable.

There was supposedly an alternative ending to that episode, but I've only seen one of them so I don't know if that is valid or not. Did the episode you watched actually have an explosion at the end?

No explosion at the end but I did enjoy the "phone" sandwich.  Chuckle

What you have to ask yourself is, how many building's are pre-prepared for demo in the usa according to agenda from 50/60 years ago?

Crazy or what?...

Also how many buildings have been prepared in this fashion to this day? Think of the repercussions if this is the case.
Reply Share
#84
(12-06-2018, 02:43 PM)Dark Moon Wrote:
(12-06-2018, 02:33 PM)DMnli Wrote:
(12-06-2018, 02:26 PM)twitchy Wrote: There was supposedly an alternative ending to that episode, but I've only seen one of them so I don't know if that is valid or not. Did the episode you watched actually have an explosion at the end?

No explosion at the end but I did enjoy the "phone" sandwich.  Chuckle

What you have to ask yourself is, how many building's are pre-prepared for demo in the usa according to agenda from 50/60 years ago?

Crazy or what?...

Also how many buildings have been prepared in this fashion to this day? Think of the repercussions if this is the case.

Don't know but the 'Illuminated' creeps behind this sort of thing usually give people a Cryptic heads up...
[Image: a8c022ae3aad116bdb663dd3b94f36de.jpg]
[Image: coup.jpg?resize=360,360]
[Image: 911-marketing-coincidences-supertramps-b...ByeRi.jpeg]
[Image: bz55c3a6be.jpg]
[Image: images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQTqOUWkjVp6iqTxrqVd4C...igCNmpYgIQ]
The Author of this Post assumes no Responsibility Or Liability, nor makes any Warranty or Guarantee of the Accuracy, or Validity of material Presented in this Post. Material Contained or Refered To in this Post is presented by Twitchy as Literary Material Only and is for Entertainment Purposes Only. This Material IS Not Intended to be Read, Inferred, or Interpreted as Information, Advice, News, Instruction, or otherwise Factual Information.
Dark Moon, Frigg, SlowLoris  likes this!
Reply Share
#85
Watch the Get Smart Episode 52 on Dailymotion!

https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x6ufv4d
Frigg, twitchy, Wingsprint  likes this!
Reply Share
#86
(12-18-2018, 12:26 PM)counterintelligence Wrote: Watch the Get Smart Episode 52 on Dailymotion!

https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x6ufv4d

Thanks so much for posting that!
The Author of this Post assumes no Responsibility Or Liability, nor makes any Warranty or Guarantee of the Accuracy, or Validity of material Presented in this Post. Material Contained or Refered To in this Post is presented by Twitchy as Literary Material Only and is for Entertainment Purposes Only. This Material IS Not Intended to be Read, Inferred, or Interpreted as Information, Advice, News, Instruction, or otherwise Factual Information.
Frigg  likes this!
Reply Share
#87
The micronic pulverization of that concrete is one of the big if's in alot of the equations I have seen dealing with the related energies of the WTC collapses. It would take an enormous amount of energy to pulverize that much concrete like that, an amount of energy that just isn't there in the weight or momentum of the collapsing rubble. It's probably one the most overlooked, yet significant pieces of evidence in support of Controlled Demolition IMO.

That's always been one of the two key tells for me. Lots of tells but the two keys for me have always been the PE/pulverisation and the angular momentum equations (where the top 22 stories "corrected themselves"). They've never added up.

IMO it's a combination of the various theories. IMO directed blast mini-nukes took out the immensely strong central core from ground level to 200 feet, which caused the collapse of the aerial at the top in one of em and most critically created the collapse momentum in both of em.

IMO thermite was then used to take out key remaining supports to maintain/correct the vertical collapse in real time so it landed in its own footprint and I think something else caused the dustification, and that was either or both explosives planted in the concrete or directed energy weapons. I tend to both.

The problem with explosives in the concrete is it ignores other anomalies like the cars burned down one side but not the other and degrades a credible alternative motive which is insurance fraud given the buildings had asbestos and were a liability and would have needed to be manually torn down floor by floor under normal conditions. Which would have cost billons. For the owner. And then we have all those suspect owner transitions. We all know 911 served a wider purpose in starting a massive MIC cash injection so does that make this a minor consideration of landlord vs tenent and buyer beware? But incorporating explosives into the concrete during construction implies someone knew about 911 at the time it was being built. Which raises a lot of other questions.

Excellent thread @twitchy

We're not yet at the bottom IMO but you've just given us a huge leap forward.

Sidebar: Notice how the above 1993 New Yorker cover features a white child jumping on "diversity's" sand castles? Propaganda doesn't work if you notice it, but you have to notice it before it stops working.
Live without fear.
Frigg, SlowLoris, twitchy  likes this!
Reply Share
#88
(12-20-2018, 04:50 AM)Dr Evil Wrote: The micronic pulverization of that concrete is one of the big if's in alot of the equations I have seen dealing with the related energies of the WTC collapses. It would take an enormous amount of energy to pulverize that much concrete like that, an amount of energy that just isn't there in the weight or momentum of the collapsing rubble. It's probably one the most overlooked, yet significant pieces of evidence in support of Controlled Demolition IMO.

That's always been one of the two key tells for me. Lots of tells but the two keys for me have always been the PE/pulverisation and the angular momentum equations (where the top 22 stories "corrected themselves"). They've never added up.

IMO it's a combination of the various theories. IMO directed blast mini-nukes took out the immensely strong central core from ground level to 200 feet, which caused the collapse of the aerial at the top in one of em and most critically created the collapse momentum in both of em.

IMO thermite was then used to take out key remaining supports to maintain/correct the vertical collapse in real time so it landed in its own footprint and I think something else caused the dustification, and that was either or both explosives planted in the concrete or directed energy weapons. I tend to both.

The problem with explosives in the concrete is it ignores other anomalies like the cars burned down one side but not the other and degrades a credible alternative motive which is insurance fraud given the buildings had asbestos and were a liability and would have needed to be manually torn down floor by floor under normal conditions. Which would have cost billons. For the owner. And then we have all those suspect owner transitions. We all know 911 served a wider purpose in starting a massive MIC cash injection so does that make this a minor consideration of landlord vs tenent and buyer beware? But incorporating explosives into the concrete during construction implies someone knew about 911 at the time it was being built. Which raises a lot of other questions.

Excellent thread @twitchy

We're not yet at the bottom IMO but you've just given us a huge leap forward.

Sidebar: Notice how the above 1993 New Yorker cover features a white child jumping on "diversity's" sand castles? Propaganda doesn't work if you notice it, but you have to notice it before it stops working.

Yeah that New Yorker Cover is just creepy.
[Image: NYer_WTC_1.jpg]
I have something like 4-5 gigs of research still left to go through in my 9-11 research files, most of them are .txt files if that tells you anything lol. It's a herculean task though as I don't like to post things without referencing or linking to the sources, and alot of the information from sites like From the Wilderness and The Memory Hole have been vanished from the internet now. I think I need to pick a general direction to move in, either WTC 7, Flight 93, or the Pentagon that way I can sort of narrow my focus and not spend so much time organizing the stuff. I spent a great deal of time just grabbing information and never put alot of thought into posterity or actually aving to organize it someday lol. You mentioned the asbestos coatings, I had some information on that as well and just speculation on my part at this point, but I wonder if Chris Bollyn and was it 'Greer's' nano-thermite was being applied during this time... I'll have to see if I can't pull up the contractor lists I had. Also I don't know if you caught the post in here about the Calcium Carbonate conversion, pretty interesting speculation for sure.
Thanks for the vote of confidence though, I'm glad people still care enough to read it!
The Author of this Post assumes no Responsibility Or Liability, nor makes any Warranty or Guarantee of the Accuracy, or Validity of material Presented in this Post. Material Contained or Refered To in this Post is presented by Twitchy as Literary Material Only and is for Entertainment Purposes Only. This Material IS Not Intended to be Read, Inferred, or Interpreted as Information, Advice, News, Instruction, or otherwise Factual Information.
Apache54, Dr Evil, SlowLoris  likes this!
Reply Share
#89
Chris Bollin's work is excellent. Lookup the 911 stuff on phibetaiota.net for the leads on the asbestos. Site's got a lot so just 911 will get it.
Live without fear.
Apache54, Frigg  likes this!
Reply Share
#90
(12-20-2018, 05:47 AM)twitchy Wrote:
(12-20-2018, 04:50 AM)Dr Evil Wrote: The micronic pulverization of that concrete is one of the big if's in alot of the equations I have seen dealing with the related energies of the WTC collapses. It would take an enormous amount of energy to pulverize that much concrete like that, an amount of energy that just isn't there in the weight or momentum of the collapsing rubble. It's probably one the most overlooked, yet significant pieces of evidence in support of Controlled Demolition IMO.

That's always been one of the two key tells for me. Lots of tells but the two keys for me have always been the PE/pulverisation and the angular momentum equations (where the top 22 stories "corrected themselves"). They've never added up.

IMO it's a combination of the various theories. IMO directed blast mini-nukes took out the immensely strong central core from ground level to 200 feet, which caused the collapse of the aerial at the top in one of em and most critically created the collapse momentum in both of em.

IMO thermite was then used to take out key remaining supports to maintain/correct the vertical collapse in real time so it landed in its own footprint and I think something else caused the dustification, and that was either or both explosives planted in the concrete or directed energy weapons. I tend to both.

The problem with explosives in the concrete is it ignores other anomalies like the cars burned down one side but not the other and degrades a credible alternative motive which is insurance fraud given the buildings had asbestos and were a liability and would have needed to be manually torn down floor by floor under normal conditions. Which would have cost billons. For the owner. And then we have all those suspect owner transitions. We all know 911 served a wider purpose in starting a massive MIC cash injection so does that make this a minor consideration of landlord vs tenent and buyer beware? But incorporating explosives into the concrete during construction implies someone knew about 911 at the time it was being built. Which raises a lot of other questions.

Excellent thread @twitchy

We're not yet at the bottom IMO but you've just given us a huge leap forward.

Sidebar: Notice how the above 1993 New Yorker cover features a white child jumping on "diversity's" sand castles? Propaganda doesn't work if you notice it, but you have to notice it before it stops working.

Yeah that New Yorker Cover is just creepy.
[Image: NYer_WTC_1.jpg]
I have something like 4-5 gigs of research still left to go through in my 9-11 research files, most of them are .txt files if that tells you anything lol. It's a herculean task though as I don't like to post things without referencing or linking to the sources, and alot of the information from sites like From the Wilderness and The Memory Hole have been vanished from the internet now. I think I need to pick a general direction to move in, either WTC 7, Flight 93, or the Pentagon that way I can sort of narrow my focus and not spend so much time organizing the stuff. I spent a great deal of time just grabbing information and never put alot of thought into posterity or actually aving to organize it someday lol. You mentioned the asbestos coatings, I had some information on that as well and just speculation on my part at this point, but I wonder if Chris Bollyn and was it 'Greer's' nano-thermite was being applied during this time... I'll have to see if I can't pull up the contractor lists I had. Also I don't know if you caught the post in here about the Calcium Carbonate conversion, pretty interesting speculation for sure.
Thanks for the vote of confidence though, I'm glad people still care enough to read it!

something you might like to hear, I have a close friend who was working (out of town) near where flight 93 crashed, he said that the scuttle butt there was LOTS of witnesses saw the plane being SHOT down by a fighter jet, it was raked with machine gun fire from those he talked to, I think they ended up using air to air missiles after that as there is nothing left of that plane. He was in a bar having a beer and dinner when the locals were talking about who saw what.
Dr Evil, Frigg, SlowLoris  likes this!
Reply Share