Welcome, Guest

 or  Register
NewsFeed

Get Smart! Epispde 52
#1
This is an older post of mine from another forum around 2006, some of the links are probably fuqued, but thought I'd post it here.

Get Smart! Epispde 52
I suspect that many of us, including myself, won't be old enough to remember the television show "Get Smart!" starring Don Adams as Maxwell Smart or Agent 86. It was a James Bond spoof of sorts, a clever blend of action and comedy and quite successful for it's time. I've seen re-runs of the show through the years, and quite enjoyed it. The name of the show is fairly ironic however as the Good Guys were called Control, the bad guys were Kaos... that in itself is pretty profound given the espionage premise of the show.
On Febuary 18, 1967, NBC aired episode 52 entitled "Smart Fit The Battle Of Jericho". Frank Lloyd Joshua operated a KAOS front posing as a construction company called the Joshua Construction Company which seemed to have a history of their High Rise buildings exploding. Max Smart infiltrates the construction company and discovers that KAOS is using explosives in the actual construction of the buildings themselves.
Construction of the World Trade Center began in 1966. This episode aired just 197 days after the WTC ground breaking.
Around the time this episode aired, the producers of the show (Leonard B. Stern, Jess Oppenheimer, Jay Sandrich, Burt Nodella, Arnie Rosen, James Komak)
have said they were directly contacted by the CIA who were very interested in where they were getting their ideas from.

"We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order."
-David Rockefeller
It is interesting to note that David Rockefeller was the force behind the design and construction of the world trade center.
Quote:http://www.infoplease.com/spot/wtc1.html
Rockefeller Brainchild
The World Trade Center was conceived in the early 1960s by the Downtown-Lower Manhattan Development Association to revitalize the seedy radio row dominated by electronic stores. Chase Manhattan Bank chairman David Rockefeller, founder of the development association, and his brother, New York governor Nelson Rockefeller, pushed hard for the project, insisting it would benefit the entire city.
Here's another interesting tid bit about the show in general...
Quote:https://web.archive.org/web/200704290947...t/fact.htm
Just for fun, here's one passage from Spy Television regarding Get Smart and the CIA:
" . . later revelations about the show’s connections to the real espionage community were as humorous as the intentional comedy. In August 1966, the U.S. Army Counter-Intelligence Corps invited Get Smart cast members to entertain at its 19th Annual Convention Banquet. According to Donna McCrohan, network publicists asked that photos be cleared for public release, and real spies posed with Adams and Feldon for gag shots (89-91). But the earlier clearance was revoked, and the photos could never be used. Agents demanded the negatives of the film and a letter stating the negatives had been given over. The letter was written with a carbon, but the carbon had been reversed. One operative confiscated the carbon paper and burned it in an ashtray. Equally unusual was a revelation by a former CIA operative that his agency was concerned that Get Smart’s writers occasionally came too close to reality, especially the Cone of Silence which they in fact had created. The agency considered sending the producers a list of areas to avoid, but elected not to as they feared such a list would result in a parody of their effort."2
Very likely. After all, a prime directive of Buck Henry, Mel Brooks, and the other creators of Get Smart was to satirize a profession they felt was idiotic. Some true-life encounters could have indeed easily been inspirations for Get Smart scripts. For example, both governmental and industry representatives came to film sets when they were either hopeful that some gadgets might be useful in the field or when they feared, as with Get Smart, Hollywood might have stumbled onto gizmos actually in use.
Creepy enough, now check this out...
Quote:https://web.archive.org/web/200704290947...read=25146
...as part of their plot, Kaos was constructing government office buildings in Washington, D.C., and waiting until the office buildings were fully occupied to detonate the explosives with all the workers inside. They were purposely underbidding all the other contractors because Kaos was subsidizing the company so that they could get the government contracts, even at a loss. A German Baron who owned an explosives company that supplied the Germans in WWI and WWIII was supplying the explosives. Joshua told Smart that all Kaos had to do was shoot a bullet at the bricks to initiate a chain reaction detonation of the explosives to bring down the whole building (a miniature version of 9/11). At the end of the episode, the Chief and Max are at the site and the Chief asks, "Where did you put the nitroglycerin?" Smart replies, "Oh, don't worry, Chief, I put it in a safe place. I put it in the cement." The workers were just mixing the cement then. I could swear that the first time I saw the episode, the show then closed with a big explosion. But the second time I saw it several months later, the show ended less dramatically, with Smart and the Chief realizing that the building would still blow up when occupied.
In the concrete... The concrete that mysteriously pulverizes itself during the collapse and has been the subject of so much debate...
[Image: nt_dust_aerial2c.jpg]
Quote:https://web.archive.org/web/200704290947...read=25146
It is very difficult to get much information about those involved with the creation of the "Get Smart" TV series. It turns out it was produced by a company called Talent Associates, which was formed in 1948 by David Susskind. Previous to this, he was a talent scout for MCA. According to Dr. John Coleman (1996) MCA has always been an arm of British intelligence, MI6, and the Committee of 300.
Episode 52 was written by Arne Sultan, interestingly, all his episodes showed the puzzle pieces for the commercial breaks. Despite being a major player in the entertainment business, his personal life is pretty obscured.
I don't know how accurate this statement is but jeezus...
Quote:https://web.archive.org/web/200704290947...read=28598
Further research uncovers that Yamasaki was a favorite architect of the Bin Laden family patrons, i.e. the Saudi royal family.
On this link, about halfway down the page, this guy has done some calculations that make alot of sense to me...
Quote:https://web.archive.org/web/200704290947...read=25146
SOME GENERAL UNANSWERED QUESTIONS
Now I will list some questions that have gone unanswered in my mind from the beginning. You undoubtedly have some of your own, but these are some I had that only the explosive concrete theory can answer thus far. I will attempt to explain them later in the paper.
Why did the second building that was hit end up being the first one to fall?
Why so little debris? As already proven, it should have been a lot higher than "a few stories."
Why no chunks of concrete found? Eyewitnesses and photos document that no significant-sized pieces of concrete were remaining.
Why so much dust? A normal building collapse, even with controlled explosives, does not generate such tremendous quantities of dust. Experienced witnesses said there was "incredible" amounts of dust (see description below).
Why were remains of survivors so vaporized? This should not have happened if the building simply collapsed from a fire.
What is the cause of the "WTC cough?" Doctors still have no clue as to what caused it. Dr. Prezant says, "It's a persistent cough,...a sore throat, and interestingly enough,...an accompanying GI irritation." (Zucker, 2001)
EXPLOSIVES MIXED IN CONCRETE ANSWERS ALL OF THE ABOVE
I know it sounds crazy, but then again does it sound so crazy? What sounds crazy to me is THAT MUCH concrete turning itself into micron sized dust because of fire. Ah well, regardless, episode 52 was one hell of coincidence if nothing else given the premise of the show.
Quote:https://web.archive.org/web/200704290947...of_Jericho
According to the bible (Joshua 5:13-6:27) it was the first battle of the Israelites during their conquest of Canaan....
Safely escaping the city the two returned to Joshua and reported that the "whole land was melting with fear".
Note also that Fit is also an old past tense for fought, in other words the title of this episode is possibly more aptly "Smart Fought The Battle Of Jericho".
The Author of this Post assumes no Responsibility Or Liability, nor makes any Warranty or Guarantee of the Accuracy, or Validity of material Presented in this Post. Material Contained or Refered To in this Post is presented by Twitchy as Literary Material Only and is for Entertainment Purposes Only. This Material IS Not Intended to be Read, Inferred, or Interpreted as Information, Advice, News, Instruction, or otherwise Factual Information.
Reply Share
#2
I look at it like this, if you have ever played the card game Spades for example, if you have a trump card in your hand, you can play it at any time really but you don't have to play it until it behooves you to do so. I'd say the extraordinary convienence of the terror related exercises that day presented the best time to play that trump card. I'm not saying it was done in a day of course, but if you had that card for forty years that's plenty of time to pick the moment or build the suit in your favor.
As to what other buildings might have similar features, god only knows. One of the links I posted, I think it was this one, http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/arc...read=28598 goes into some detail on that speculation.
I'm fairly certain though that major urban areas generally require access to core columns and such specifically for the placement of demolition charges in the event that the building should need to be demolished in the future, which isn't quite the same concept, but it's a creepy thought nonetheless.
I found this interesting as well though I couldn't source the quote...
Quote:https://web.archive.org/web/200704290947.../16254.htm
Before the dust had settled on September 11, the mayor of New York City, Rudolph Giuliani, and Kenneth Holden of the city s Dept. of Design and Construction (DDC), contracted 4 major construction management companies to begin the removal of the debris from the World Trade Center.
Three of the four major companies involved in the clean-up are foreign owned: AMEC, Bovis Lend Lease, both headquartered in London; and Turner, a subsidiary of Germany's Hochtief.
Only Tully Construction of Flushing, New York, is a truly American-owned company. Peter Tully, president of the company, was, notably, the only person willing to speak openly with AFP about his work at the WTC site....
Think of the thousands of file cabinets, computers, and telephones in those towers -I never saw one everything was pulverized, Tully said, Everything that was above grade above the 6th and 7th floor disintegrated it was like an explosion.
Tully Construction specializes in concrete. AFP asked Tully if he had ever seen concrete pulverize as it did at the WTC. No never, he said.
Tully Construction has seen ALOT of concrete.
AMEC is another Company involved with both WTC and the Pentagon, they just renovated the section of the Pentagon that was hit before being contracted to WTC clean up...
Quote:https://web.archive.org/web/200704290947.../16254.htm
The London-based firm AMEC, ranked by Engineering News Record magazine as the world's largest firm , oversaw the actual management of the debris removal at both the Pentagon and the WTC.
AMEC was the only construction company working at both disaster sites, the company's website says, AMEC is managing Hudson River barging operations to transport the rubble from the entire WTC site to a landfill on Staten Island and to steel recycling operations in New Jersey.
AMEC had just finished the renovation at the Pentagon when it was called to manage the removal of debris there and at the World Trade Center....
AMEC had just completed a project to strengthen and renovate a section of the Pentagon, Wedge 1, when the building was attacked. The damaged area is between Wedges 1 and 2.
The Author of this Post assumes no Responsibility Or Liability, nor makes any Warranty or Guarantee of the Accuracy, or Validity of material Presented in this Post. Material Contained or Refered To in this Post is presented by Twitchy as Literary Material Only and is for Entertainment Purposes Only. This Material IS Not Intended to be Read, Inferred, or Interpreted as Information, Advice, News, Instruction, or otherwise Factual Information.
Reply Share
#3
Quote:Tully Construction specializes in concrete. AFP asked Tully if he had ever seen concrete pulverize as it did at the WTC. No never, he said.
The micronic pulverization of that concrete is one of the big if's in alot of the equations I have seen dealing with the related energies of the WTC collapses. It would take an enormous amount of energy to pulverize that much concrete like that, an amount of energy that just isn't there in the weight or momentum of the collapsing rubble. It's probably one the most overlooked, yet significant pieces of evidence in support of Controlled Demolition IMO.
And while yes it may be just cooincidence, I find it highly unlikely the 1960's era CIA walks onto the set of a television show to investigate cooincidences.

Let's entertain this theory, if for naught else but to rule it out...
Observation- The Unprecedented Collapses of the Twin Towers produced abnormally fine concrete debris. No plausible explination for this dust has been put forth so far, and the energy required to pulverize that much concrete into micronic particulate is not present or accounted for in current collapse models.
Hypothesis- The Concrete supplied for the construction of the Twin Towers of the WTC complex was an anomolous mixture designed to somehow potentiate a controlled demolition.
Now what?
Some Pics...
[Image: CONCRETE-06-IMAGE.jpg]
[Image: table_1.html]
[Image: 09112001_wtc_tower_collapses_small.jpg]
[Image: wtc_collapse1B.jpg]
[Image: aeparesponse2.jpg]
[Image: 0004.jpg]
[Image: wtc_9_81.jpg]
[Image: southcorestands.gif]
I know it sounds crazy but then again, it's not as crazy as some other theories being put forth. I linked to this site earlier in the thread... It's a must read to really get a good start on this theory...
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/arc...read=25146
I'm not sure I understand the chemistry involved regarding the conversion of CaCO3 to CaO, but it goes into alot of detail about half way down the page, but he made alot of sense to me in saying "The production of calcium oxide from calcium carbonate would cause a drastic reduction in volume of material due to the release of carbon dioxide gas."
The Author of this Post assumes no Responsibility Or Liability, nor makes any Warranty or Guarantee of the Accuracy, or Validity of material Presented in this Post. Material Contained or Refered To in this Post is presented by Twitchy as Literary Material Only and is for Entertainment Purposes Only. This Material IS Not Intended to be Read, Inferred, or Interpreted as Information, Advice, News, Instruction, or otherwise Factual Information.
Reply Share
#4
Since I was a kid I’ve always liked get smart .


You just ruined it .
.


" I have no rules to tie me down "

Leonard Snart

“ less feelings, more beer”

Mick Rory

.
Reply Share
#5
Smart Fit the Battle of Jericho... I just read through the bible's account of Jericho recently and there were 'spies' in the city of Jericho who came out to Joshua's army to report the goings on, I suppose it's entirely possible that some of the spies could have been ancient mortar mixers. The impenetrable walls of the city of Jericho were brought down by shouts and trumpet blowing as Joshua's army circled the city. Ironic title for that episode considering the plot.
he said something to the effect, don't worry chief, he had put the explosives in the concrete, at the end of the episode.
Interestingly, I read somewhere in researching this thread that the last bit of the episode was re-edited to exclude the explosion scene in later airings of that episode. If indeed it was re-edited, that's odd that they would cut out the climatic explosion at the end. Edited because of Network objections, or perhaps it was too close to reality for comfort.

I don't know a great deal about concrete, but it would seem entirely plausible to me that concrete could be mixed with something to cause a instability or a critical failure under certain conditions or provocation. Indeed I think that is precisely what happened at Jericho, no real miracle, just simple resonant harmonics and some. It sure would go a long way towards explaining the complete pulverization, indeed atomization of all that enormous amount of concrete, I have yet to see a definitive alternative explination and the energy to do that just isn't in the official equations. With the exception of the lung problems and the haunting imagery of the dust clouds, that concrete has been completely, officially, ignored.
In my own research I was somewhat surprised to find that in dense urban areas, alot of larger buildings were/are constructed with easy access to support columns and the like to allow for controlled demolitions in the event that the building would need to be removed at some point in the future. However we're talking access though, not actual demolition devices themselves. Creepy stuff there In Nothing We Trust, thanks for posting it.
Given the Bin Laden's ties to the US through Saudi Defense Contracts and the like, it's really creepy stuff.
I read that apparently the original episode when it first aired, ended with an explosion, which was edited out in later airings. I haven't been able to find any further information to confirm or deny this though. I've yet to find anyone who remembers if the original airing had an explosion or not. If it did, I wonder why in the world they would edit that out in subsequent airings unless perhaps the little visit from the CIA during the production of the show had something to do with it.
I wish I could find somebody who remebered the original airing of that episode though, if it was edited out it probably won't be included in a DVD collection.
Also another interesting episode included something about a "Cone of Death" or something to that effect, that one is supposed to an example of real technology which was 'exposed' by the show and caused some concern within the intelligence community. I don't know the episode number of that, but I remember reading about that when I was researching for the thread.
Frank Loyd Joshua... Jericho... Creepy stuff considering the obvious reference to architecture and the tumbling walls of Jericho.
Looks like if there was an explosion in the original airing it has indeed been edited out.

More on that toxic dust in the news today...
The first is from the New York Times, a major news outlet...
Quote:https://web.archive.org/web/200710211028...ei=5087%0A
New York Times
Rejecting ’06 Finding, Report Says Detective Didn’t Die From 9/11 Dust
New York City’s chief medical examiner has concluded that the death of a city police detective who worked hundreds of hours on the smoldering debris pile at ground zero after the Sept. 11 attacks was not caused by exposure to toxic dust there.

Contradicting a New Jersey pathologist who had found the death “directly related” to ground zero dust, the medical examiner, Dr. Charles S. Hirsch, acknowledged that “foreign material” had been found in the lungs of the detective, James Zadroga, but insisted that it had not come from the trade center site.
And then this from a more obscure new source...
Quote:https://web.archive.org/web/200710211028...&aid=74737
Zadroga's Family To Meet With ME Who Said Death Not WTC Related

October 19, 2007

The family of a police detective who died last year is set to meet with the city's medical examiner today, after he concluded that the detective's death was not related to his hundreds of hours spent at the World Trade Center site.

In a letter to the family of Detective James Zadroga, Dr. Charles Hirsch acknowledged that foreign material was found in Zagroga's lungs, but says that he is certain that the material was not from dust inhaled at the World Trade Center.

The finding contradicts that of a New Jersey pathologist, who said the 34-year-old Zadroga's death was directly related to World Trade Center dust.

Zadroga's father insists both he and his son developed a cough after working at the World Trade Center.

"There’s so much evidence showing that he was sick from the world trade center and now here they're trying to discredit his name. The guy was a hero that's all we ever ask of them to recognize him as a hero,” said Zadroga’s father Joseph Zadroga.

The family had asked the city medical examiner to review Zadroga's case in a bid to have him officially listed as a victim of the September 11th attacks.
How can pathologist simply 'conclude' that the dust that DID cause his death didn't come from WTC, especially given that his symptoms developed then? Sounds like somebody doesn't want their dust scrutinized perhaps, or do doctors just conclude things like that all the time in high profile cases?
The Author of this Post assumes no Responsibility Or Liability, nor makes any Warranty or Guarantee of the Accuracy, or Validity of material Presented in this Post. Material Contained or Refered To in this Post is presented by Twitchy as Literary Material Only and is for Entertainment Purposes Only. This Material IS Not Intended to be Read, Inferred, or Interpreted as Information, Advice, News, Instruction, or otherwise Factual Information.
Reply Share
#6
personally think I'm on to something with this, but I'm nowhere near conclusive yet. There's just something about the concrete vaporizing like it did that didn't seem right at all and none of the current collapse models even mention the energy required for that kind of pulverization. Then of course we have the seismic data from Palisades...
[Image: kim-wtc-1.jpg]
that many have claimed were consistent with underground detonations, and the angular cuts in the steel cores, cuts that we were told were part of the cleaning up process (debunkers fail to see the rescue personnel in those pictures which seems to me to date the photos long before any clean up started). Just a few of the MANY things that just don't add up regarding 9-11.
Whoever it was was awful eager to report it...
maybe too eager lol...
[Image: 15201.jpg]
In the show, CHAOS had already destroyed three buildings. That made me wonder about the unimpacted building 7... which of course fell straight down in what we're supposed to believe is a fire related collapse.
[Image: ats50244_wtc-7-small.gif]
Two questions, first is, 'Do we know Exactly what time it was when Larry Silverstien actually said his famous "Pull it" line?' Second question is do we know the exact time which the BBC broadcast thier live feed as pictured below...
[Image: ats60985_hmmmm.jpg]
Obivously you can see Building 7 has not yet collapsed, yet the live reporter and the teletype beneath her are reporting that hit has. It would be interesting to know if Silverstien's decision to 'pull it' preceeded the BBC's broadcast (it is my understanding from what I've read, that the otherwise meticulous chaps have since 'lost' the footage?). If it did precede this broadcast, was it time enough to load up the graphics and report it?

The show also mentions that Jericho Construction had ties to the Germans during both world wars, after the weird anachronism about Reagan and Grable. His VP later of course was George Bush, and given the history of Prescott Bush and his financial ties to Harriman, Thyssen, IG Farben and the like, that struck me as another weird cooincidence.
Quote:http://www.whitehouse.gov/about/presiden...aldreagan/
From his first marriage to actress Jane Wyman, he had two children, Maureen and Michael. Maureen passed away in 2001. In 1952 he married Nancy Davis, who was also an actress, and they had two children, Patricia Ann and Ronald Prescott....
As president of the Screen Actors Guild, Reagan became embroiled in disputes over the issue of Communism in the film industry; his political views shifted from liberal to conservative. He toured the country as a television host, becoming a spokesman for conservatism. In 1966 he was elected Governor of California by a margin of a million votes; he was re-elected in 1970.
Prescott... wonder where he came up with that name?
I don't know why the mention of Reagan 'dancing with Grable' bothers me in that episode exactly, except for the fact that I don't believe in cooincidences, and I've worked on enough film sets to tell you that nothing in front of that camera, particularly in a Big Budget production like this was for it's time, is there by cooincidence. Reagan went on to become president, obviously, and his VP was a creepy little man eyebrow deep in covert operations and with family ties to germany in WWII.
The Author of this Post assumes no Responsibility Or Liability, nor makes any Warranty or Guarantee of the Accuracy, or Validity of material Presented in this Post. Material Contained or Refered To in this Post is presented by Twitchy as Literary Material Only and is for Entertainment Purposes Only. This Material IS Not Intended to be Read, Inferred, or Interpreted as Information, Advice, News, Instruction, or otherwise Factual Information.
Reply Share
#7
I have an audio copy of an interview with Laffoley, I think it's the one you linked to earlier, if I can find it I will convert it to a mp3 and upload it. I've been digging through google trying to find a link to the Reader's Digest bit you mentioned, I did find a several of these on google, but so far they all seem to be using the same quote...
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=rea...&aqi=n1g10
At the bottom of that page there is a link to another forum that says "In the early 1970's the Readers Digest ran a story, that said explosives would be built in to the WTC Towers to facilitate their eventual controlled ..." but oddly there is no cached version and the text google snipped for the search results is now gone from the page it links to.
Quote:http://goldismoney.info/forums/archive/i...26909.html
The Readers Digest ran a story during the WTC construction stating explosives would be built into the buildings to facilitate their eventual demolition.
The same quote is found on Pravda...
http://engforum.pravda.ru/showthread.php?t=258512
and on Reddit...
http://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comment...e_of_work/
There are several other forums this is mentioned on but I think it is against the TOS here to link to other forums(?), however I am as of yet unable to locate a copy of the original article or an original source for that quote. My grandmother has a pretty extensive collection of Reader's Digests, I will see if I can't dig through them and come up with something.
Unrelated, but it looks like Reader's Digest has recently filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy as well.
I knew that Nelson Rockefeller had worked with the National Security Council but their supervision of CIA operations, to the extent of calling it the 'Planning Coordination Group' was new to me ...
Nelson Rockefeller and company were the ones that pushed the construction of the WTC complex to begin with. Throw Kissinger and god knows who else in the mix and a false flag operation is business as usual for these guys, and long term globalist agendas are their modus operandi.
Interesting that he worked with Eisenhower so closely, Eisenhower probably had a good idea of what was happening and who he was dealing with, something I think he regretted towards the end and he tried to warn us on his way out of office... Too bad we didn't listen then.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8y06NSBBRtY
I've not had the time lately to dig into this as much as I would like, it's a pretty interesting thread though and I'm glad somebody is reading it. Great catch with the Upshot/Grable bit, another cooincidence to add to the list for that episode considering that particular device would have likely been the precursor for the SADM, or special atomic demolitions munitions.
[Image: 2325c4d7ed86.jpg]
Don't know about the demolition plans, a google search turned up an ungodly wall of unrelated 9-11 material... I do know that large urban areas, even then, often require leaving 'easy access' to core columns for future demolition. The actual blueprints were kept under wraps for years after the attack, odd considering most building plans are public domain.
Quote:http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence...rints.html
Tower Blueprints

Surviving Evidence of the World Trade Center Attack

The blueprints to the Twin Towers and Building 7 remained off-limits to the public for more than five years after the attack, despite the fact that the buildings were built with public money and that the engineering drawings of public buildings are supposed to be public information. 1 Incredibly, the team of engineers from the ASCE that conducted the only investigation of the building "collapses" before Ground Zero had been cleaned up lacked access to the buildings' blueprints -- at least until they signed waivers that they would not use the evidence in a lawsuit against the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey. 2

LINK

Whistleblower Releases Blueprints

In March of 2007, an extensive set of detailed architectural drawings of the World Trade Center became public through the actions of a whistleblower.
what do you make of the elevated Tritium levels detected in the WTC debris at Fresh Kills landfill, 700 times what was anticipated, even after months of decontamination i.e. being sprayed down with water and exposed to heavy rainfall? Proponents of the official story seemed to have settled on exit signs, which is ridiculous considering those specific signs were removed in the 1980's.

Another aspect you might be able to shed some light on is the odd loss of radio communication on site immediately preceding both the collapses of WTC1 and WTC2, would a push plate type detonation of a SADM change the radius or shape of the resulting EMP sufficiently to cause interference on the surrounding ground level but not an electrical overload?

Been trying to find a free copy of the episode, but so far youtube is the only one I've found and it's apparently $1.99 to watch it lol
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4pa3Ey7li88
The Author of this Post assumes no Responsibility Or Liability, nor makes any Warranty or Guarantee of the Accuracy, or Validity of material Presented in this Post. Material Contained or Refered To in this Post is presented by Twitchy as Literary Material Only and is for Entertainment Purposes Only. This Material IS Not Intended to be Read, Inferred, or Interpreted as Information, Advice, News, Instruction, or otherwise Factual Information.
Reply Share
#8
I thought you would enjoy this link as well...
https://donaldfox.wordpress.com/2013/04/...ed-on-911/

I would venture to guess that they typically wait until fire/rescue and retrieval operations are over with though, wouldn't you? If you take a look at your pics, those are emergency responders taken long before the Loizeaux crew started cutting beams and hauling off debris....those beams were cut for sure.
...the only folks who were initially privy to the recordings (of Ladder 15 and Battalion Chief Orio Palmer communicating ) were forced to sign non-disclosure agreements or gag ordered due to them being somehow relevant to the impending trial of Zacarias Moussaoui or fear over some esoteric legal liability of the Port Authority.
'immediately preceding'... 'up to moment of building collapse'... not sure I see the issue you have there, but there again this is something that was widely reported at the time and typically attributed by OS cheerleaders to the collapse of the North Tower's radio tower. Never mind the pyroclastic dust clouds that by some estimates eliminated as much as 1/3 of the mass of the buildings, seismic recordings from Pallisades, countless eyewitness accounts of explosions, toasted metal frames and cars, or the strange electrical light shows reported in buildings in the immediate area as well.
All of these very unusual, unprecedented oddities can all be easily explained by the use of SADMs, however It seems to me that Occam's Razor only applies if it fits the status quo.
I'm pretty sure pulling survivors out of rubble comes before standing on top of them to cut up core columns.

Edit:
I also seem to recall that only a few photographers were officially allowed on the site, so it shouldn't be too difficult to date those photos as other people were being arrested or having their cameras confiscated. Also recall that folks were being arrested for having Geiger counters or radiation detectors there as well... how odd.
Absolutely, there were beams cut during the cleanup. However there wasn't as much cutting as there might have been thankfully, as most of the columns were already severed into nearly transportable sizes. I remember Loizeaux or one of those creeps commenting on that during the clean up. Lucky for them I guess.
I said I recall one of the clean up mooks discussing how the columns had been cut into easily transportable sizes and 'lucky them', by which I meant they apparently fell to the ground in a handy foot print collapse in conveniently sized transportable pieces. Excepting of course the 600 feet laterally ejected material from the initial blasts... er collapses.
And... There only a few photographers that had clearance to be on the site, regular joes snapping pics were being arrested and having their cameras confiscated. Should be easy enough o date those pics considering eh?


More to come...
The Author of this Post assumes no Responsibility Or Liability, nor makes any Warranty or Guarantee of the Accuracy, or Validity of material Presented in this Post. Material Contained or Refered To in this Post is presented by Twitchy as Literary Material Only and is for Entertainment Purposes Only. This Material IS Not Intended to be Read, Inferred, or Interpreted as Information, Advice, News, Instruction, or otherwise Factual Information.
Reply Share
#9
The notorious exit signs were known to have been removed during renovations long before 9-11. The entire site was littered with tritium, in the basement of building 6 for example, water samples were taken by the Department of Energy on 9/13 and they found tritium there as high as 55 times background readings. That's after a thorough decontamination that estimates as much as 4 million gallons of water being used on the site and not counting what would have been released and dispersed in gaseous form. That's just building six's tritium, mind you, let alone what was tested at the freshkills landfill MONTHS later. I won't even get into the samples collected and tested by the USGS on Sept. 17 and 18 that found cesium, uranium, thorium, barium, strontium, yttrium, rubidium, molybdenum, lanthanum, cerium, chromium and zinc... etc. ad nauseum. Strontium was detected in levels as high as 3000 ppm, and I don't think many watches or gun sights would explain that, would they?
The Author of this Post assumes no Responsibility Or Liability, nor makes any Warranty or Guarantee of the Accuracy, or Validity of material Presented in this Post. Material Contained or Refered To in this Post is presented by Twitchy as Literary Material Only and is for Entertainment Purposes Only. This Material IS Not Intended to be Read, Inferred, or Interpreted as Information, Advice, News, Instruction, or otherwise Factual Information.
Reply Share
#10
(11-24-2018, 11:06 PM)FallingDown Wrote: Since I was a kid I’ve always liked get smart .


You just ruined it .
There's an old rumor that the Illuminatti require that they reveal their own plots to the public, maybe they did in this case as well. There were a few other aspects of the show that caught the attention of the CIA like the Cone of Silence as well.
The Author of this Post assumes no Responsibility Or Liability, nor makes any Warranty or Guarantee of the Accuracy, or Validity of material Presented in this Post. Material Contained or Refered To in this Post is presented by Twitchy as Literary Material Only and is for Entertainment Purposes Only. This Material IS Not Intended to be Read, Inferred, or Interpreted as Information, Advice, News, Instruction, or otherwise Factual Information.
Screaming_Yellow_Zonkers  likes this!
Reply Share

Post Thread  Back To Forum
[-]
Quick Reply
Message
Type your reply to this message here.

Please select the number: 10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10