The Fringe | Conspiracy, News, Politics, and Fun Forum!

Full Version: THREE CHEERS! Federal Judge Declines to Block Citizenship Question from US 2020 Census
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Hooray!  Hooray!  Hooray!  A Federal Judge has ruled the U.S. Census MAY include citizenship status, something the dems don't want to see.

Sanity is returning, albeit slowly.  Cheer

SNIPS from https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/02...20-census/

  "A federal judge ruled late Friday she is unconvinced of an immediate need to block a citizenship question from the 2020 census over privacy concerns.

   US District Judge Dabney Friedrich declined to issue a preliminary injunction requested by a privacy and civil liberties nonprofit group, the Electronic Privacy Information Center.

   The group argued that the US Census Bureau was required to complete a privacy impact assessment before Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross announced the addition of the question.

   In response, the government acknowledged it is required to update its privacy impact assessments, but must do so before collecting census responses, rather than before deciding what questions would appear."
The illegals could plead the 5th but Consutiional rights only apply to citizens.  They won't have a problem lying on a census questionnaire if they don't respect our immigration laws.

GTFO if you're here illegally.
You beat me ... I just came here to post this !! Cheer

https://twitter.com/JohnCooper0610/statu...3495702533
All-righty..

V6sRZf4
I may be mistaken on this but I don’t think I am. Congressional seats are dependent on population in a particular area, if the population increases they get more seats. It isn’t based on citizenship, it’s based on population only, regardless of nationality, meaning it doesn’t matter.
That’s why the democrats are so adamant about NOT enforcing illegal immigration.
Pretty F’d up ain’t it.
(02-10-2019, 09:23 PM)Capnron Wrote: [ -> ]I may be mistaken on this but I don’t think I am. Congressional seats are dependent on population in a particular area, if the population increases they get more seats. It isn’t based on citizenship, it’s based on population only, regardless of nationality, meaning it doesn’t matter.
That’s why the democrats are so adamant about NOT enforcing illegal immigration.
Pretty F’d up ain’t it.

Yes Capn'
(02-10-2019, 09:23 PM)Capnron Wrote: [ -> ]I may be mistaken on this but I don’t think I am. Congressional seats are dependent on population in a particular area, if the population increases they get more seats. It isn’t based on citizenship, it’s based on population only, regardless of nationality, meaning it doesn’t matter.
That’s why the democrats are so adamant about NOT enforcing illegal immigration.
Pretty F’d up ain’t it.

That sucks. Seems as though being a citizen doesn't mean much anymore, except when it comes to supporting other people. Facepalm
(02-10-2019, 02:34 PM)oldcynic Wrote: [ -> ]Hooray!  Hooray!  Hooray!  A Federal Judge has ruled the U.S. Census MAY include citizenship status, something the dems don't want to see.

Sanity is returning, albeit slowly.  Cheer

SNIPS from https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/02...20-census/

  "A federal judge ruled late Friday she is unconvinced of an immediate need to block a citizenship question from the 2020 census over privacy concerns.

   US District Judge Dabney Friedrich declined to issue a preliminary injunction requested by a privacy and civil liberties nonprofit group, the Electronic Privacy Information Center.

   The group argued that the US Census Bureau was required to complete a privacy impact assessment before Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross announced the addition of the question.

   In response, the government acknowledged it is required to update its privacy impact assessments, but must do so before collecting census responses, rather than before deciding what questions would appear."

Yes, heaven forbid one should not be afforded the privilege of practicing
their illegality in private! Facepalm

Excellent news. Wink

@Capnron You are entirely correct about congressional representation
being based upon population alone (and why the Dems thus want open
borders and a new welfare-dependent underclass). @Angry Red Man
started a good thread some time ago about election fraud where this was
discussed on a number of occasions.