The Fringe | Conspiracy, News, Politics, and Fun Forum!

Full Version: Simulation Theory
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.




In 1963, Philip K. Dick won the coveted Hugo Award for his novel The Man in the High Castle, beating out such sci-fi luminaries as Marion Zimmer Bradley and Arthur C. Clarke. Of the novel, The Guardian writes, “Nothing in the book is as it seems. Most characters are not what they say they are, most objects are fake.” The plot—an alternate history in which the Axis Powers have won World War II—turns on a popular but contraband novel called The Grasshopper Lies Heavy. Written by the titular character, the book describes the world of an Allied victory, and—in the vein of his worlds-within-worlds thematic—Dick’s novel suggests that this book-within-a-book may in fact describe the “real” world of the novel, or one glimpsed through the novel’s reality as at least highly possible.
The Man in the High Castle may be Dick’s most straightforwardly compelling illustration of the experience of alternate realties, but it is only one among very many. In an interview Dick gave while at the high profile Metz science fiction conference in France in 1977, he said that like David Hume’s description of the “intuitive type of person,” he lived “in terms of possibilities rather than in terms of actualities.” Dick also tells a parable of an ancient, complicated, and temperamental automated record player called the “Capard,” which reverted to varying states of destructive chaos. “This Capard,” Dick says, “epitomized an inscrutable ultra-sophisticated universe which was in the habit of doing unexpected things.”

http://www.openculture.com/2014/02/phili...ality.html

Philip K. Dick is inarguably one of the most thought-provoking writers of all time, and what’s more, MOST OF WHAT HE WROTE CAME TRUE. Here, we take a closer look at his now famous speech of 1977, in which he proclaims our world to be a Computer Simulation.

http://thephaser.com/2017/08/a-closer-lo...on-theory/


A new scientific paper published in arXiv and co-authored by Silas Beane from the University of Bonn reveals strong statistical evidence that our reality is, indeed, a grand computer simulation. The title of the paper is Constraints on the Universe as a Numerical Simulation.

IN SIMPLE TERMS
Your computer display screen has a finite number of pixels available, and this is called the "screen resolution" such as 1920 x 1440. This means there are 1920 pixels across and 1440 pixels vertically.

Everything you see on your computer screen must be drawn and depicted using these pixels, and nothing can be displayed that's only half a pixel. For example, you can't draw a vertical line on the screen that exists between the pixels that are hard-wired into the screen resolution. Everything you view on the monitor -- a computer game, a website, even a video -- is essentially transposed onto the "lattice" of pixels that exist in your hardware.

Your hardware, in effect, has a hard-wired "resolution limit" which defines the smallest size of any object that can be depicted on the screen.
OUR REALITY IS PIXELATED
Now, zoom out to the "real" world in which we live. Here in the real world, we think that there are no pixels and that we can move fluidly to any location we wish. We are not digitized being, we think; we're analog beings living in a fluid world without the pixelation of a computer screen, right?

http://www.helpfreetheearth.com/news716_simulation.html


Not so fast. As it turns out, our "reality" is also pixelated, just at a very fine resolution. This study out of Bonn revealed that the energy level of cosmic rays "snaps to" the "resolution" of the universe in which we live. The very laws of electromagnetic radiation, in other words, are confined by the resolution of the three-dimensional simulation we call a "universe."

The existence of this construct, if proven, also proves intelligent design by a conscious Creator who built the universe to begin with. This is the upshot of this scientific discovery that most scientists refuse to acknowledge. But the conclusion is inescapable: If our universe is a carefully-constructed simulation, then there must have been a purpose behind its construction as well as a Creator who built it.

The presumed Creator set all the physical constants in the universe, initiated the so-called "Big Bang" and let things play out from there without "tinkering" with the universe on a day-to-day basis.

http://www.helpfreetheearth.com/news716_simulation.html

The bibliography of Philip K. Dick includes 44 novels, 121 short stories, and 14 short story collections published by American science fiction author Philip K. Dick (December 16, 1928 – March 2, 1982) during his lifetime. [1]
At the time of his death, Dick's work was generally known to only science fiction readers, and many of his novels and short stories were out of print.[2] To date, a total of 44 novels have been published and translations have appeared in 25 languages.[3] Six volumes of selected correspondence, written by Dick from 1938 through 1982, were published between 1991 and 2009.
The Library of America has issued three collections of Dick's novels. The first, published in June 2007, contained The Man in the High Castle, The Three Stigmata of Palmer Eldritch, Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? and Ubik, and was the first time science fiction was included in the LOA canon.[4][5] The second collection was issued in July 2008 and included Martian Time Slip, Dr. Bloodmoney, Now Wait for Last Year, Flow My Tears, the Policeman Said, and A Scanner Darkly. The third collection was published in July 2009 and included A Maze of Death and the VALIS trilogy (VALIS, The Divine Invasion, and The Transmigration of Timothy Archer).
At least nine films have been adapted from Dick's work, with Blade Runner (1982) widely considered a "masterpiece".[6]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_K._...bliography

Full Throttle

Outstanding!! I have read some of his work. Hiding3
The MATRIX Movie Dissolving Hallway SPFX is a pretty good representation of Density in Structure to express Presence in Dimension . EFX Designer was an acid head , My guess .


.
Thank you, I'll watch it later while on the treadmill!
I'm a big believer in the simulation theory.
I've enjoyed aa lot of those fictional scenarios.

CAVEAT
ACHTUNG!
I have seen the presentation of the rhomboid triangles, (I think they are plank length?) that seem to be the lowest observable "bit" or pixel, if you will. Very interesting, especially when combined with E8 theory.
Great articles.

There is a study where it's shown that energy moving in diagonals actually moves by going horizontal then vertical, like following the squares of grid paper. It's an unusual result and not clearly explained yet.
I love chemistry for the study of electron shells.
Why those, why there? I am not talking periodic table, but the structure and substructure laws that determine matter. Very interesting.
Laws behind electron shells hold the structural framework clues that build our world.
The quanta is present in these substructures.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Xx0SsffdMBw
QUANTUM  SYNAPSE .

The Quantum Physics of Synaptic communication via the SNARE protein complex
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science...

Slow cortical potentials and “inner time consciousness” — A neuro-phenomenal hypothesis about the “width of present”
Author links open overlay panel Georg Northoff...
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science...

Quantum Neurophysics: From non-living matter to Quantum Neurobiology and Psychopathology.The concepts of quantum brain, quantum mind and quantum consciousness have been increasingly gaining currency in recent years, both in scientific papers and in the popular press. In fact, the concept of the quantum brain is a general framework. Included in it are basically four main sub-headings. These are often incorrectly used interchangeably. The first of these and the one which started the quantum mind/consciousness debate was the place of consciousness in the problem of measurement in quantum mechanics. Debate on the problem of quantum measurement and about the place of the conscious observer has lasted almost a century. One solution to this problem is that the participation of a conscious observer in the experiment will radically change our understanding of the universe and our relationship with the outside world. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science...