The Fringe | Conspiracy, News, Politics, and Fun Forum!

Full Version: City Ordinance: Austin Churches Must Hire Homosexual, Transexual Pastors
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
“Every church in Austin that refuses to hire practicing homosexuals as clergy or church employees is violating city law and subject to civil penalties and liability,” the filing, U.S. Pastor Council v. Austin, reads.

“The City of Austin’s failure to exempt church hiring decisions . . . violates the U.S. Constitution, the Texas Constitution and the Texas Religious Freedom Restoration Act.”

In Houston, a tough legal struggle ended in the ordinance being placed on a ballot for a referendum vote noted as the Houston Equal Rights Ordinance or HERO

https://christianaction.org/city-ordinan...l-pastors/
(11-17-2018, 12:41 PM)FlyoverCountry Wrote: [ -> ]“Every church in Austin that refuses to hire practicing homosexuals as clergy or church employees is violating city law and subject to civil penalties and liability,” the filing, U.S. Pastor Council v. Austin, reads.

“The City of Austin’s failure to exempt church hiring decisions . . . violates the U.S. Constitution, the Texas Constitution and the Texas Religious Freedom Restoration Act.”

In Houston, a tough legal struggle ended in the ordinance being placed on a ballot for a referendum vote noted as the Houston Equal Rights Ordinance or HERO

https://christianaction.org/city-ordinan...l-pastors/

Facepalm
Close all the churches and sell the property to gay strip clubs.

Buy land outside of town for cheaper than you're paying in taxes now.

Win/win for everyone.
This better apply to mosques too.
(11-17-2018, 12:59 PM)Rick Farias Wrote: [ -> ]This better apply to mosques too.

It won't.
So we have practicing homosexuals as clergy or church employees and priest in Porsches being pulled by kids! If ya don’t like it, they can be reached at (666) 666-0666 !

Jptdknpa

Satan makes me laugh!
Libtards

Ffs Facepalm
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof..."


Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between Man & his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, & not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should "make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof," thus building a wall of separation between Church & State. Adhering to this expression of the supreme will of the nation in behalf of the rights of conscience, I shall see with sincere satisfaction the progress of those sentiments which tend to restore to man all his natural rights, convinced he has no natural right in opposition to his social duties.
(11-17-2018, 01:06 PM)It Wrote: [ -> ]Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof..."


Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between Man & his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, & not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should "make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof," thus building a wall of separation between Church & State. Adhering to this expression of the supreme will of the nation in behalf of the rights of conscience, I shall see with sincere satisfaction the progress of those sentiments which tend to restore to man all his natural rights, convinced he has no natural right in opposition to his social duties.

When the church entered into a legal agreement with the government, 501c3, the church chose it's side and it wasn't God or Christians
(11-17-2018, 12:51 PM)WNC Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-17-2018, 12:41 PM)FlyoverCountry Wrote: [ -> ]“Every church in Austin that refuses to hire practicing homosexuals as clergy or church employees is violating city law and subject to civil penalties and liability,” the filing, U.S. Pastor Council v. Austin, reads.

“The City of Austin’s failure to exempt church hiring decisions . . . violates the U.S. Constitution, the Texas Constitution and the Texas Religious Freedom Restoration Act.”

In Houston, a tough legal struggle ended in the ordinance being placed on a ballot for a referendum vote noted as the Houston Equal Rights Ordinance or HERO

https://christianaction.org/city-ordinan...l-pastors/

Facepalm

[Image: VPCBR3S.jpg]