(10-23-2018, 12:28 PM)Slappy Kincaid Wrote: [ -> ]This is an interesting development. HRC's boy talking openly about Q.
Not in a good way obviously.
https://twitter.com/PhilippeReines/statu...7944182784
Feels like the crap could be about to hit the fan. If one of Hillarys people are mentioning Q in any way, they are worried.
Is this the most "high profile" person to mention Q so far Slappy ?
(10-23-2018, 02:03 PM)Billy Wrote: [ -> ] (10-23-2018, 12:28 PM)Slappy Kincaid Wrote: [ -> ]This is an interesting development. HRC's boy talking openly about Q.
Not in a good way obviously.
https://twitter.com/PhilippeReines/statu...7944182784
Feels like the crap could be about to hit the fan. If one of Hillarys people are mentioning Q in any way, they are worried.
Is this the most "high profile" person to mention Q so far Slappy ?
As far as I know, it is Billy.
Just for him to bring it up is significant.
(10-23-2018, 01:03 PM)Hickory Wrote: [ -> ] (10-23-2018, 12:29 PM)sloonie Wrote: [ -> ] (10-23-2018, 11:59 AM)Hickory Wrote: [ -> ]Sloonie is correct when she writes "POTUS signaled the paying of invasion forces." But who is Ben Drefuss? What idiot (Ben Dreyfuss!) thinks that Trump indicating someone 'peeling off currency to someone else' is a 'hand job' sign? Sick!
Hick, that flew right by my radar.....guess my mind is too clean! Â Ha!
Deplorable Mich at other place asked about pattern of Q posts, and Natural one noted first was 10, then 20,
so we should expect 30 this time, which puts us at Nov 7, day after election.
Sounds about right......
You all probably peek over there anyhow, so I don't know if I should bother posting
these things here?
Anyhow, hi all!
I am still leaning towards "17", but I will never underestimate Michelle or Natural One, either. That is a good and reasonable  proposition on their part.
Personally, I never go back to GLP (for a variety of reasons which are mine to know), but I do sorely miss several of the posters there who are really good, smart patriots.
Don't go back their either. Always had to clean the computer after I went so don't even know if one can peek in and see what's up. I do notice, however, that I recognize writing styles of some guests who were with me on Inquire Within's thread and then keybored's thread and on the luna flora rally threads.
(10-23-2018, 12:28 PM)Slappy Kincaid Wrote: [ -> ]This is an interesting development. HRC's boy talking openly about Q.
Not in a good way obviously.
https://twitter.com/PhilippeReines/statu...7944182784
Saw that tweet in real time and someone gave him quite the answer. And then today noted on tentacles thread that there were many more posts taking swipes at q anon and his/her/their information. Thought reines signaled them to start with those talking points by his tweet.
(10-23-2018, 12:32 PM)Hickory Wrote: [ -> ]
I know it is off topic (?), but Q would call this topic an attempt at 'Changing the Narrative'
I am getting really tired of this Khashoggi fiasco.
1) He had 'articles' published TWICE in the Washington Post in the expanse of at least 30 years of being a war correspondent. That is one 'article' (we don't know exactly what that constitutes) for every fifteen years! THAT makes him a "Washington Post Correspondent"? It sure doesn't take much to wear that moniker, does it?
2) He has a long history of being involved in Middle East politics, as does his family
3) He (and his family) has been aligned with the 'opposition faction' of Saudi Arabia
4) Those countries are NOT the United States or Europe; They have a different religion from most of us, they do things 'their own way', and their citizens know the consequences of violating their country's 'ways'. The public dismemberment of hands, feet, and heads is standard procedure over there. It discourages others from committing the same crimes, and is a most effective deterrent. Something similar (hanging) used to be utilized here with similar effective results.
5) The US gets upset when other countries interfere in our daily business, telling us what we have done that they don't like, but our MSM thinks it is perfectly fine for us to pass judgement on a foreign country and to leverage them to be like us, and to get our Government involved in the whole mess.
6) IMHO, Khashoggi is just another member of the Ben Talal faction being eliminated in a way that sends a message to the rest of that faction that they had better stay in their caves or it will happen to them, too.
7) If he WAS dismembered while still alive, it would indicate to me that he was feeding information to DS assets that worked against the Current SA government that cost Saudi lives; Lives that may have belonged to family members or friends of his 'welcoming committee'.
8) Whatever happened, it is being blown out of proportion to discredit and bring down the SA government, which has cut off funding for the Cabal. THIS IS THE REASON BEHIND IT ALL: FUNDING FOR THE CABAL! No more, no less! It is equally likely to me that the Cabal murdered him to frame Crown Prince Salmon as it is the SA 'committee' did it! The value of a human life over there is next to zero. Did you ever hear of a suicide bomber who parents had taken him to learn how to do just that? A life means nothing to them, a lesson WE must wrap our heads around!
Someone noted here I think via a tweet that the articles about his death had his byline and the question was asked and the tweet I believe immediately delivered. Thought that was interesting. I didn't go read the articles they put out but, if they put something about his death on his byline that seems very odd doesn't it? But, it went by the wayside. No one has mentioned it since.
(10-23-2018, 12:28 PM)Slappy Kincaid Wrote: [ -> ]This is an interesting development. HRC's boy talking openly about Q.
Not in a good way obviously.
https://twitter.com/PhilippeReines/statu...7944182784
As we approach midterms and the dems and libtards become more and more desperate, they expose themselves as they try to defuse Republican countermeasures before they even have a chance to happen. It's like a child running to their mother and pleading that the dog just pulled down the curtains in the living room,
before the Mother knows that something has happened (and the dog is outside!).
This lets us know their fears and perceived weaknesses and vulnerabilities. It also lets us know who is really 'getting to them' most effectively. If Q is such a poor 'conspiracy theory' and 'irrelevant cult', why give Q credibility by mentioning Q at all?
Is this an attempt to hide something in plain view? Did they actually plant the phony bomb in the mail box (it would be illegal to mail it! But it is ALSO illegal to put something in a mailbox) with the intention of gaining sympathy, but blaming Q for making fun of them is their 'insurance policy'?
(10-23-2018, 01:40 PM)Slappy Kincaid Wrote: [ -> ]Perfectly correct @Hickory sometimes folks forget that about transponders.
They can also be used for other purposes.
No military aircraft will be seen if it doesn't want to be.
Yep. The Mode 4 (crypto) codes for IFF change every 24hrs. A few here remember when the Walker bros. threw a monkey in that wrench. Pretty easy to figure out the system's been compromised when a couple of Tu-95 bombers are able to get within 100nm of our east coast...squawking the correct codes for that day.
This was probably nothing more than a post-maint checkflight.
I just tweeted that back to him @Looky 