The Fringe | Conspiracy, News, Politics, and Fun Forum!

(06-08-2019, 06:03 PM)Aquarius Wrote: [ -> ]

(06-08-2019, 12:46 PM)RedAuroras Wrote: [ -> ]This might go along with a quick convo I had recently aboard a PE flight. I had asked about all the upgrades in services down in Gitmo. The phrase, "Look for things to start poppin' soon..." was the last thing said.

Thank you, RA !!  
These snippets of encouragement keep me going !!  

(06-08-2019, 12:47 PM)Hickory Wrote: [ -> ]There are so many replies to Slappy's post that shouldn't be in a spoiler, I don't want to possibly offend anyone by 'hiding' their comments. So I will just start something new.

So, what IS Q up to?
A) What do we know?
1) We have more than we know
2) We don’t know what it is that we have, but hasn’t rung a bell in our heads yet. MANY things have multiple meanings and multiple occurrences
3) There is a plan, and if we don’t trust it, we will become part of the problem and not part of the solution
4) Every timeline so far has had a delay or two; even D-Day had a delay.
5) Enemies don’t give up when threatened verbally and/or legally; they MUST be defeated
6) Sometimes, the most effective way to get an opponent to lower their guard is to let them think they are winning and/or that you are losing support
7) Behind every WH ploy is a tenet from either ‘The Art of the Deal’ or ‘The Art of War’
8) Everything Q posts help us to remain motivated, but also reveals ‘intel’ to the BH’s
9) Sometimes, silence is more terrifying to an enemy than known but unproven possibilities
10) During POTUS’ ‘tweet storms’,  Q is often silent
11) Q has been pointing out older drops that are now being proven as correct (future proves the past) or are just now coming to pass on the Q Clock
12) There is no slower way to proceed than always doing things ‘legally’, but there is no faster way for your efforts to become sidetracked than to do things illegally (unless, of course, you murder all the witnesses)

B) What do we NOT know?

1) Why Q does certain things at certain times but doesn’t do them at other times?
2) What more important responsibilities Q has other than just leading us?
3) Can Q act on his own, or only with the permission of Q+?
4) Does Q get exasperated with us and our persistent whining?
5) What is the strategic purpose of Q, if not to build the President’s base of support?
6) Will ‘Q’ ever be publicly revealed, or is Q a strategic tool that must remain ‘covert’ until the end of Trump’s presidency?
7) How many years will this quest require to become fulfilled, worldwide? Can it be accomplished in this generation?

C) Is it necessary for us to ‘know’ in order to achieve the final positive outcome, or is it simply imperative that we trust the plan?

(06-08-2019, 09:15 AM)Heir Wrote: [ -> ]

(06-08-2019, 08:29 AM)Slappy Kincaid Wrote: [ -> ]What in the hell is this all about?

Is this a normal farming method in Tx?

Pivot Irrigation .




.

(06-08-2019, 06:12 PM)Aquarius Wrote: [ -> ]

(06-08-2019, 12:47 PM)Hickory Wrote: [ -> ]

Spoiler

There are so many replies to Slappy's post that shouldn't be in a spoiler, I don't want to possibly offend anyone by 'hiding' their comments. So I will just start something new.

So, what IS Q up to?
A) What do we know?
1) We have more than we know
2) We don’t know what it is that we have, but hasn’t rung a bell in our heads yet. MANY things have multiple meanings and multiple occurrences
3) There is a plan, and if we don’t trust it, we will become part of the problem and not part of the solution
4) Every timeline so far has had a delay or two; even D-Day had a delay.
5) Enemies don’t give up when threatened verbally and/or legally; they MUST be defeated
6) Sometimes, the most effective way to get an opponent to lower their guard is to let them think they are winning and/or that you are losing support
7) Behind every WH ploy is a tenet from either ‘The Art of the Deal’ or ‘The Art of War’
8) Everything Q posts help us to remain motivated, but also reveals ‘intel’ to the BH’s
9) Sometimes, silence is more terrifying to an enemy than known but unproven possibilities
10) During POTUS’ ‘tweet storms’,  Q is often silent
11) Q has been pointing out older drops that are now being proven as correct (future proves the past) or are just now coming to pass on the Q Clock
12) There is no slower way to proceed than always doing things ‘legally’, but there is no faster way for your efforts to become sidetracked than to do things illegally (unless, of course, you murder all the witnesses)

B) What do we NOT know?

1) Why Q does certain things at certain times but doesn’t do them at other times?
2) What more important responsibilities Q has other than just leading us?
3) Can Q act on his own, or only with the permission of Q+?
4) Does Q get exasperated with us and our persistent whining?
5) What is the strategic purpose of Q, if not to build the President’s base of support?
6) Will ‘Q’ ever be publicly revealed, or is Q a strategic tool that must remain ‘covert’ until the end of Trump’s presidency?
7) How many years will this quest require to become fulfilled, worldwide? Can it be accomplished in this generation?

C) Is it necessary for us to ‘know’ in order to achieve the final positive outcome, or is it simply imperative that we trust the plan?

Excellent post.  All of it.  I put most of it in a Spoiler only to save space, no offense intended.  

For myself, your C) is what I choose.  
Others with a more agile and legal mind plus the time and wherewithal to "dig deeper" will choose other pieces of your post.  

I do not believe it is necessary for us to 'know', although the final outcome does in fact hinge on PDJT's base holding strong and hopefully growing, so it is imperative that we TRUST THE PLAN.  

My 2 cents.

(06-08-2019, 09:17 PM)Kels Wrote: [ -> ]

(06-08-2019, 06:12 PM)Aquarius Wrote: [ -> ]

(06-08-2019, 12:47 PM)Hickory Wrote: [ -> ]

Spoiler

There are so many replies to Slappy's post that shouldn't be in a spoiler, I don't want to possibly offend anyone by 'hiding' their comments. So I will just start something new.

So, what IS Q up to?
A) What do we know?
1) We have more than we know
2) We don’t know what it is that we have, but hasn’t rung a bell in our heads yet. MANY things have multiple meanings and multiple occurrences
3) There is a plan, and if we don’t trust it, we will become part of the problem and not part of the solution
4) Every timeline so far has had a delay or two; even D-Day had a delay.
5) Enemies don’t give up when threatened verbally and/or legally; they MUST be defeated
6) Sometimes, the most effective way to get an opponent to lower their guard is to let them think they are winning and/or that you are losing support
7) Behind every WH ploy is a tenet from either ‘The Art of the Deal’ or ‘The Art of War’
8) Everything Q posts help us to remain motivated, but also reveals ‘intel’ to the BH’s
9) Sometimes, silence is more terrifying to an enemy than known but unproven possibilities
10) During POTUS’ ‘tweet storms’,  Q is often silent
11) Q has been pointing out older drops that are now being proven as correct (future proves the past) or are just now coming to pass on the Q Clock
12) There is no slower way to proceed than always doing things ‘legally’, but there is no faster way for your efforts to become sidetracked than to do things illegally (unless, of course, you murder all the witnesses)

B) What do we NOT know?

1) Why Q does certain things at certain times but doesn’t do them at other times?
2) What more important responsibilities Q has other than just leading us?
3) Can Q act on his own, or only with the permission of Q+?
4) Does Q get exasperated with us and our persistent whining?
5) What is the strategic purpose of Q, if not to build the President’s base of support?
6) Will ‘Q’ ever be publicly revealed, or is Q a strategic tool that must remain ‘covert’ until the end of Trump’s presidency?
7) How many years will this quest require to become fulfilled, worldwide? Can it be accomplished in this generation?

C) Is it necessary for us to ‘know’ in order to achieve the final positive outcome, or is it simply imperative that we trust the plan?

Excellent post.  All of it.  I put most of it in a Spoiler only to save space, no offense intended.  

For myself, your C) is what I choose.  
Others with a more agile and legal mind plus the time and wherewithal to "dig deeper" will choose other pieces of your post.  

I do not believe it is necessary for us to 'know', although the final outcome does in fact hinge on PDJT's base holding strong and hopefully growing, so it is imperative that we TRUST THE PLAN.  

My 2 cents.

My sense is that we're not going for a pole reversal type of change.  Seems the plan is more for a gradual move to a "proper normal".  

I think more and more ppl are slowly feeling that it's safe for them to think what they really think rather than being led around by the official nose ring.  That's got to be a first taste of intellectual and common sense liberty for many.  They'll want more.  It would certainly be the more peaceful -and lasting- way to get it right.

(06-07-2019, 10:23 PM)Slappy Kincaid Wrote: [ -> ]

(06-07-2019, 08:55 PM)Slappy Kincaid Wrote: [ -> ]FBI docs: Study found Clinton email server hacked, info found on dark web

Information from Hillary Clinton's unauthorized, private email server were found on the dark web, newly released documents from the FBI show.  It has long been suspected that Clinton's server, located in her home in Chappaquiddick, N.Y., might have been breached by hackers, but that has never been publicly confirmed.

But notes from a independent review, obtained by the FBI and released from "The Vault" on Friday, determined the Romanian hacker known as Guccifer breached a server for Clinton ally Sidney Blumenthal, who was passing information about Libya to the secretary of state, and Clinton's server was "indirectly" hacked likely as a result of the breach of Blumenthal's server. This information was transferred to a computer or network located south of Bucharest, Romania. The report said a second indirect hack of Clinton's server by people working on Guccifer's behalf took place on May 22, 2009, followed by other breaches.

The study found Guccifer used an anonymous server in Russia to carry out the "penetration" and there was a "high possibility" that Russian services monitored these servers and might have a copy.  One file taken from Clinton's server that was not seen on Blumenthal's server was found on the deep web, a hidden layer of the Internet not indexed by search engines, and the dark web, a shady constellation of darknets with layers of encryption favored by cybercriminals and hackers. It is described as an Excel spreadsheet with "targeting data" that would receive the highest level of classification. "If it is determined by the by the FBI that this file ever was overtly classified, it will serve as a potential 'smoking gun document,'" the notes said. "This file represents a major loss to the Intelligence Community because it appears to be targeting data," the notes said. This file was translated from Russian to Arabic, represented a list of targets "possibly" created by a Russian source, "located or intercepted by our services," and was sent to Clinton by an unknown individual, the notes said.  

Guccifer was found to have penetrated "a number of targets" and 37,000 files were found on a computer traced to an IP address he obtained.  Guccifer, whose real name is Marcel Lazar, has been serving prison time for hacking charges since 2014, both in the U.S. and in his native Romania.  It has been known that he successfully hacked Blumenthal, a breach that led to the first revelation of Clinton's use of the private clintonemail.com domain. Guccifer was convicted on charges of hacking more than 100 prominent Americans, including former secretary of state Colin Powell and a sister to former President George W. Bush. He had claimed to hack Clinton during her term as secretary of state, though that has never been confirmed publicly.

An online persona known as Guccifer 2.0 claimed to be the hacker behind the breach of the Democratic National Committee computer network during the 2016 election. Guccifer 2.0 gave stolen emails from Democrats to WikiLeaks, which then published them. Special counsel Robert Mueller determined that Guccifer 2.0 was a front operated by Russia's Main Intelligence Directorate of the General Staff, or GRU.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/...n-dark-web

''

Hillary R. Clinton Part 33 of 33

https://www.scribd.com/document/41269391...from_embed

I doubt that many have read this,

(06-08-2019, 11:47 PM)Aquarius Wrote: [ -> ]Did you all see this POTUS Tweet?
He's calling the Fake News Media "Fakers".  
I would bet dollars to donuts he knows very well that word sounds a lot like another word that is used frequently in today's world.  

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/stat...7401439232