(03-09-2019, 11:22 PM)=42 Wrote: [ -> ] (03-09-2019, 11:09 PM)Slappy Kincaid Wrote: [ -> ] (03-09-2019, 10:50 PM)=42 Wrote: [ -> ]
Not sure if I was clear in my above questions. I usually try to keep posts brief.
What struck me is that today's Q brought forward Q post 2042 from Aug 31, 2018, in which Q lays out a flow and connections of the FISA's in a straight forward rather than cryptic way. Did the POTUS order allow Q to "leak" FISA info to us without any concern for reprisal, even though the DOJ still has not released?
Potus asked for declass, 17 Sep 18.
![[Image: FKNjee3.png]](https://i.imgur.com/FKNjee3.png)
Thanks Slappy! 17 days after post 2024. That blows my theory.
At least you're considering options.
Don't think of it as a blown theory, more as an avenue of exploration that can now be discounted.
The misses can be just as valuable as the hits.

I'm not saying that this is a Q post - even though we know that they can post anonymously - but this has too many replies just to be about the post No.
Anonymous 03/10/19 (Sun) 02:53:34 7b29f2 (1) No.5600000>>5600020 >>5600027 >>5600033 >>5600034 >>5600036 >>5600042 >>5600043 >>5600045 >>5600046 >>5600053 >>5600054 >>5600055 >>5600057 >>5600062 >>5600065 >>5600067 >>5600070 >>5600072 >>5600075 >>5600077 >>5600079 >>5600081 >>5600086 >>5600087 >>5600091 >>5600092 >>5600099 >>5600102 >>5600103 >>5600106 >>5600111 >>5600112 >>5600114 >>5600115 >>5600116 >>5600119 >>5600120 >>5600121 >>5600122 >>5600127 >>5600129 >>5600131 >>5600133 >>5600137 >>5600142 >>5600145 >>5600155 >>5600171 >>5600183 >>5600187 >>5600188 >>5600190 >>5600194 >>5600197 >>5600199 >>5600206 >>5600241 >>5600245 >>5600257 >>5600262 >>5600271 >>5600280 >>5600289 >>5600305 >>5600311 >>5600324 >>5600325 >>5600331 >>5600336 >>5600347 >>5600351 >>5600382 >>5600408 >>5600410 >>5600419 >>5600436 >>5600446 >>5600467 >>5600509 >>5600514 >>5600532 >>5600541 >>5600554 >>5600559 >>5600578
It has begun.
https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/5599788.html#q5600000
(03-09-2019, 06:59 PM)Hickory Wrote: [ -> ] (03-09-2019, 05:31 PM)Slappy Kincaid Wrote: [ -> ]
https://twitter.com/DonaldJTrumpJr/statu...5872902145
Will someone please explain to me how someone can be a gay guy AND a lesbian AT THE SAME TIME? One is attracted to men and the other attracted to women. So is he/she/it saying they are bisexual, but only in same sex affairs?
Excuse me while I go puke~
I was wondering about that, so went to the original Tweet, and she was totally misquoting a Sufi Poet, Rumi, who is most likely turning over in his grave by her manipulation of his words.
(03-09-2019, 11:10 PM)sloonie Wrote: [ -> ]A post from other place, just thought to put here:
(from skinny chic)
Short story but notable. I broke down and made a twitter account about a week ago specifically so I could reply to Q linked posts. I’m with Q memes, nothing else. Today I just went to post a Q popcorn meme on the link for Sara Carter and immediately after was informed my “twitter account is locked for violating twitter rules” and that “Twitter reserves the right to prevent anything trending that they do not deem appropriate.”
No shit! We have got to be very close and they have got to be very scared!!! Not on 8 so for those that are feel free to share. In light of recent Q posts, not a coincidence
If one just posts memes only often they will get flagged by twitter. It's always good to reply to a post several times a day and not to post just memes in a row. I know I love to post memes but one cannot only post memes or they will be flagged!
I have no idea what the trending reference is about.
(03-09-2019, 11:43 PM)Slappy Kincaid Wrote: [ -> ]I'm not saying that this is a Q post - even though we know that they can post anonymously - but this has too many replies just to be about the post No.
Anonymous 03/10/19 (Sun) 02:53:34 7b29f2 (1) No.5600000>>5600020 >>5600027 >>5600033 >>5600034 >>5600036 >>5600042 >>5600043 >>5600045 >>5600046 >>5600053 >>5600054 >>5600055 >>5600057 >>5600062 >>5600065 >>5600067 >>5600070 >>5600072 >>5600075 >>5600077 >>5600079 >>5600081 >>5600086 >>5600087 >>5600091 >>5600092 >>5600099 >>5600102 >>5600103 >>5600106 >>5600111 >>5600112 >>5600114 >>5600115 >>5600116 >>5600119 >>5600120 >>5600121 >>5600122 >>5600127 >>5600129 >>5600131 >>5600133 >>5600137 >>5600142 >>5600145 >>5600155 >>5600171 >>5600183 >>5600187 >>5600188 >>5600190 >>5600194 >>5600197 >>5600199 >>5600206 >>5600241 >>5600245 >>5600257 >>5600262 >>5600271 >>5600280 >>5600289 >>5600305 >>5600311 >>5600324 >>5600325 >>5600331 >>5600336 >>5600347 >>5600351 >>5600382 >>5600408 >>5600410 >>5600419 >>5600436 >>5600446 >>5600467 >>5600509 >>5600514 >>5600532 >>5600541 >>5600554 >>5600559 >>5600578
It has begun.
Slappy is there a link to that?
(03-09-2019, 08:44 PM)Deplorable Michele B Wrote: [ -> ] (03-08-2019, 04:10 PM)Sassy Wrote: [ -> ] (03-08-2019, 04:07 PM)Slappy Kincaid Wrote: [ -> ]Put a fork in her!
Biting the hand that created you and your Somali community. Very smart!!!
https://twitter.com/USAEmily1/status/110...6046377984
That would appear to me to be the first solid EVIDENCE that maybe those three dipshit women really ARE "controlled opposition," and this was all planned.
After gaining support among the millenials by leaning WAAAAY left, seeming to want to give away the farm (and health care, and food and housing) to everyone for free, bringing in bills that say stuff like "after birth abortions," and "immigrants are people too," -
NOW they drop the big booms and say "Obama bad man....."
Leading to Cognitive Dissonance, but beginning to spark doubt in the minds of the brain-dead dims who follow their "leaders" blindly.
Just keep in mind, even if 'controlled opposition', it isn't to help the Republican party or Donald J Trump.
What it IS is to weaken us, and bring in a strong socialist party, with support across the country, which will include many more radical Muslims joining OUR Congress if they can get away with it. This plan didn't just happen, it's been in the works for maybe many years.