(02-16-2019, 05:54 AM)Billy Bulgaria Wrote: [ -> ] (02-16-2019, 02:17 AM)Sami Wrote: [ -> ]Her story changed a bit! Â
https://twitter.com/Josiensor/status/109...8731718656
Seems like these isis brides have been coming back to the UK for a good while now.
Net them, throw them in the sea.
Everything goes quiet.
There is no story.
oooh! This looks promising.
![[Image: Q-02-14-19-3-non-Asian-2.png]](https://i.postimg.cc/WzQFn38m/Q-02-14-19-3-non-Asian-2.png)
(02-16-2019, 09:22 AM)Deplorable Michele B Wrote: [ -> ] (02-15-2019, 10:15 PM)Kels Wrote: [ -> ] (02-15-2019, 05:14 PM)Hickory Wrote: [ -> ]Didn't Q ask this same question about a month ago? Didn't we find the answers then?
Yes, there are some answers. Â I searched back to around pg. 1600 where Slappy posted that she had her last surgery at Sloan Kettering, and about the BOD. Â I'll cross reference Mayo and S/K BODs, since BODs are mentioned in two different circumstances.
There has to be something more than public, media reported info. Â Q asks who is *really* managing her care, as if there is some entity other than Sloan Kettering keeping her and her story "alive". Â And I'm not sure Q meant "off market" with the drug referral. Â "Off market" technically means a drug that was taken off the market because it was found that the risk outweighed the benefit. Â While unconventional, using such a drug doesn't seem all that controversial or shocking to me. Â What would be shocking is her being provided drugs -or technology- that are ethically abhorrent. Â For example, a means to artificially keep someone at some minimal level of animation who should be comatose...or dead.
Q also asks "What is the real medical diagnosis of [RBG]?" Â So it's not really cancer at this point? Â
Since he has now brought it up twice, it seems Q is trying to tell us that the RBG mystery hasn't been fleshed out enough in discussion, and that there are even larger implications than we think. Â It's beyond bizarre, we have very little to go on, and the whole thing is just bugging me, I guess. Â 
After reading those same two reiterated Questions: Who is *really* treating RBG, and what is her real diagnosis, coupled with the later reference to McNoName, I sorta wonder if Q is telling us that Ruthie is going the way of McCain....fake diagnosis of cancer now, (although she may have had cancer in the past), but it’s being used to explain her long absence during a visit to Gitmo, and them awaiting a date with executioner.
Who was it she was pictured sitting with in one Q drop?  Was that to show us some of the evidence they have and to inform us she had sold us out, and was ruling in favor of some foreign entity to establish precedents which would carry forward in America’s future?  I can’t remember who was in the pic.  Would that be treason?  Same way we saw pics of McShame and ISIS leaders.
Unfortunately, "Treason" is more often than not 'in the eyes of the beholder'. I feel sure that Obama, Killery, and Brennen would claim that each of us are 'traitors', while we see THEM as the 'traitors'. Actual 'Treason' is an act of war by a citizen against their own Country, changing sides in a conflict or helping the other side (while still owing allegiance to the US), according to the US Code.
(§2381. Treason "Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.")
The big question is when 'supporting your philosophy of governing' becomes 'changing sides' or 'aiding and comforting the enemy'?
"Sedition (Seditious Conspiracy)" carries the wording "by force" which means that the guilty person must be plotting to overthrow the government 'by force'.
§2384. Seditious conspiracy  If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.
I would think most of the characters we deal with are more likely guilty of "Rebellion or Insurrection"
§2383. Rebellion or insurrection  Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
or 'Advocating Overthrow of Government', which I think has become a rather common 'occurrence', if not 'habit' of the left
§2385. Advocating overthrow of Government  Whoever knowingly or willfully advocates, abets, advises, or teaches the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying the government of the United States or the government of any State, Territory, District or Possession thereof, or the government of any political subdivision therein, by force or violence, or by the assassination of any officer of any such government; or
Whoever, with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of any such government, prints, publishes, edits, issues, circulates, sells, distributes, or publicly displays any written or printed matter advocating, advising, or teaching the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying any government in the United States by force or violence, or attempts to do so; or
Whoever organizes or helps or attempts to organize any society, group, or assembly of persons who teach, advocate, or encourage the overthrow or destruction of any such government by force or violence; or becomes or is a member of, or affiliates with, any such society, group, or assembly of persons, knowing the purposes thereof—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction.
If two or more persons conspire to commit any offense named in this section, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction.
As used in this section, the terms "organizes" and "organize", with respect to any society, group, or assembly of persons, include the recruiting of new members, the forming of new units, and the regrouping or expansion of existing clubs, classes, and other units of such society, group, or assembly of persons.
http://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=...ion=prelim
The Rosenbergs were prosecuted and sentenced to death for a whole lot less than what any of that administration has done.
(02-16-2019, 11:50 AM)Slappy Kincaid Wrote: [ -> ]oooh! This looks promising.
![[Image: 6-A1-FC429-FA77-41-B2-AD23-1-AA4-A279327-A.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/mrw9sTZR/6-A1-FC429-FA77-41-B2-AD23-1-AA4-A279327-A.jpg)
![[Image: Q-02-14-19-3-non-Asian-2.png]](https://i.postimg.cc/WzQFn38m/Q-02-14-19-3-non-Asian-2.png)
Are they still so stupid to think they are not being tracked everywhere???
Wait, What am I thinking??? Of course they are!
Isn't there a program called "Blurity" that can help clear up blurry pics, that can be downloaded on the computer?
@
Slappy Kincaid
Maybe the tall guy in the pic is Warner???